| |
| | Post 11 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | i understand that the point is to make you read faster, but the wpms that are way above 1000 like some are giving sounds a bit stretched to me.
__________________ ![]() si deum nobiscum, quis contra? AS LONG AS DIXIE STILL EXISTS,THIS COUNTRY WILL NEVER FALL |
| |
| | Post 12 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
__________________ MICHAEL HATKEVICH, C/Capt, CAP | |
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I'm sure that THE human brain has potential. I was questioning whether YOURS did. Or did you just scan the lines? It takes more than three tries on an internet speed reading course to increase WPM to 1573. Maybe I'm just slow. but in three tries, I only had about a 5-6% increase in speed. And I still can't even remember what I read(something about the Wizard of Oz in there somewhere). |
| |
| | Post 14 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | its just a black screen for me...
__________________ Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | ok now im sure that anyone claiming 1k+ in just three tries is full of it. the other day i found out that my english teacher is also a speedreading teacher. she reads at 1500 wpm after years of classes and constant reading. no one here is going to hit 1k+ in three tries of an online demo. |
| |
| | Post 16 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | And I reckon that's all she wrote... |
| |
| | Post 17 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Well im a he and it took more than 3 by that time |
| |