| |
| | Post 1 | |
| Banned ![]() | Post; Eurofighter a shooting star in clash with US jetsQuote:
| |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Banned ![]() | Post; Re: Eurofighter a shooting star in clash with US jetsThe F-15 is regarded as the best in the world? I'm not sure if the Typhoon would handle a dogfight against an F-16 or F/A-18. It would be pretty awesome if it could, of course. I'm surprised to hear modern planes still need to keep a radar lock on the target while the missiles are in flight. I thought most anti-air missiles were fire-and-forget these days. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | I know that Gripen has won countless of dogfights against F-16 and F/A-18s
__________________ ![]() Devin, they are holding your life and they will never let go! Come home safe! |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
Does anybody know how well modern European planes (Gripen, Rafale, Typhoon) fare against Russian ones. It would also be worth knowing when the F-16s and F/A-18s that were "splashed" by Gripens and the F-15s that were defeated by that Typhoon were last upgraded. | |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Some F-15s out there are 25 years old or older. I think it would have been more of a surprise if the F-15s had outperformed the E-Fighter. A better comparison might be the latest against the latest. Read some comments about the E-Fighter and the F-22 Raptor from someone who has flown both. http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123009594 http://www.af.mil/news/story_print.a...ryID=123010102 Before you go screaming that Gen. Jump (U.S. AF COS) is obviously biased, read the comments and you'll see that he says he believes "the two aircraft are running neck-and-neck". They are different aircraft with different roles on the battlefield. Here's another article, "Measuring the F-22 Advantage - (compared to European fighters; Rafael, Eurofighter, and Gripen?)" http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1403808/posts
__________________ "I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier." To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post. |
| |
| | Post 6 | ||
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
Well i will continue to lock, its not easy to find those kinds of thigs on mil.se lol I think it was slightly older finish F/A-18 (new for finland but i dont think they ware of the latest make) and F-16 from norway if i'm not misstaken. | ||
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Primus Pilus | Ehhh...the F-15 is 25 years old and designed as a high-speed interceptor, not a dogfighter. I think a newer model F-16, or F/A-18E/F (Super Hornet or "Rhino" models) could take the Eurofighter.
__________________ Midshipman 3/C, USNR |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Primus Pilus | i want to see the Eurofighter vs. the F/A-22 Raptor, then we'll see what's what |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Hi, Is it just me or the Eurofighter looks Very Very Similar to MIG 1.44 ..... they are Twins .... Eurofighter See here MIG 1.44 ![]() Ooo and F-18 Super Hornet, Eurofighter Typhoon,Su-30, Su-33, Su-35 and Dassault Rafale are all 4.5th Generation Fighters ........... Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor is a 5 th generation Plane ,..... it would be fair on Typhoon to compare and compete with them ........... It would be fair to compare it with the Fighters of it's calss. Peace -=SF-13=-
__________________ ![]() | Chestnut Hill Apartments | Indian Revolutioners | San Diego Dog Training | San Diego Website Design | |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Primus Pilus | No, the Eurofighter has no similarities with the Mig 1.44. I've heard enough of the "this looks like this" contest already. You cannot simply judge an aircraft by its wing designs and intakes.
__________________ ![]() Cogito ergo sum |
| |