Unfortunately, I know I'm not perfect. That'd be why I'm not willing to incriminate someone else based on something that makes them happy. To an extent, of course, before all the crap about "would you deny a child molester his happiness?" comes out.

You are transparent.

Religion was mentioned.

You tried an old interagators/interviewers trick of trying to walk back the topic and convince the person or persons that religion was actually on your side and tried to use that topic to gain control and superiority.

Now I don't know who taught you that but they suck at it.

You used it as a bludgeon. You need to use it as a feather and work your mojo.

But what do I know.

From the sound of things? Not a whole lot.


I used Jesus' quotes because they fit with my argument. Just like YOU used Leviticus to support YOUR argument.

I could give a damn whether or not Jesus was on the side of religion. I only used the quotes because they spoke about being understanding and non-judgmental.

Originally Posted by 03USMC

But what do I know.

Hehehehehe....." A whole lot"..You're a smart man 03..

Two girls kissing? The "epitome of epitome of hypocrisy"?-
No. Instead two girls that need tender loving care so they can see their wrongs. And I'd gladly help them!

It's funny that lesbians are accepted by people more than gay men. But consider that while lesbians can rape others, the higher than norm percentage of pedophiles (but not hebephiles) that are gay men. It's called (where I live) "same sex molestation".

But you won't find lesbians doing that. Why? You will find female teachers banging high school boys (and almost always the femal teachers are so fugly even I won't touch them when I'm drunk), but you won't find them forcefully molesting grade school boy. You will however find male teachers molesting boys from kindergarten until the pre-high school age. Ending right about the age when boys CAN tell the difference between right and wrong in sex.....coincidence?

But then, gay men also don't shoot videos like "two girls one cup" and get crap loads of people watching it (like those two girls did), thinking it's sick and disgusting, but watching it repeatedly anyhow.

And because of that women feel safer in the presence of gay men because they know the gay men would rather bang a man than bang them. So women actually get more promiscuous with gay men than with straight men, because they know nothing will happen. Men, they'll screw straight women OR lesbians because men in general will screw anything that moves. And if it ain't moving, they'll kick it around until it does....

two girls one cup? I can only imagine what thats about

Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

From the sound of things? Not a whole lot.


I used Jesus' quotes because they fit with my argument. Just like YOU used Leviticus to support YOUR argument.

I could give a damn whether or not Jesus was on the side of religion. I only used the quotes because they spoke about being understanding and
non-judgmental.

Ahhh Grasshopper again you fail to snatch the pebble from my hand.

I used bible references as a foil and as an example in reference to your ham handed attempts to use faith. Seriously you need to go back and take it in context.

No where did I state it was my belief or my value, and still I put you on the defensive. Read Art of War by Sun Zu. After that read Saul Alinsky and Mao they are both insufferable commies but take your knowledge where you can.

You also need to learn the meaning of measure and discussion so run off and check out the library.

Originally Posted by 03USMC

Ahhh Grasshopper again you fail to snatch the pebble from my hand.

I used bible references as a foil and as an example in reference to your ham handed attempts to use faith. Seriously you need to go back and take it in context.

No where did I state it was my belief or my value, and still I put you on the defensive. Read Art of War by Sun Zu. After that read Saul Alinsky and Mao they are both insufferable commies but take your knowledge where you can.

You also need to learn the meaning of measure and discussion so run off and check out the library.

Ahh, yet again, your pre-conceived notions about youth successfully blind you to the truth of the matter.

I WAS NOT TRYING TO USE "FAITH." *Please* try and get that through the helmet and into your brain. I only quoted Jesus because that's the best way I know to say it.

I'm defending the QUOTES, not the religious aspect of it... As you can see by my REPEATED attempts to tell you that I was NOT using the religious affiliation of Jesus Christ to incorporate faith into my argument.

Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

Ahh, yet again, your pre-conceived notions about youth successfully blind you to the truth of the matter.

I WAS NOT TRYING TO USE "FAITH." *Please* try and get that through the helmet and into your brain. I only quoted Jesus because that's the best way I know to say it.

So you are admitting that 03s preconceived ideas of youth (inexperience) were correct. You have no better way of expressing what you think than to quote "the bobble".

To deny that those with experience can see the shortcomings of those who have little or no experience, is somewhat specious to say the least and is the best single indicator of that lack of maturity.

...Spike?... Did you READ what I posted? I said once again the pre-conceived ideas SUCCESSFULLY BLINDED him... As in, he's NOT correct. Because that really is a great way to say it... If Plato had said "Before you reach to remove the speck from your neighbor's eye, be sure and remove the plank from your own" then I'd quote Plato instead. But he didn't say that, and Jesus did (allegedly), so I'm going to quote Jesus.

Spike... Everyone's opinions on homosexuality are little more than their ideas based on experience. No one has FACTUAL evidence on homosexuals, other than the fact that they are sexually attracted to the same sex. No one's opinion is any more valid than the other, especially when I too have a great deal of personal experience with homosexuals.