![]() | About Digital camouflage: CADPAT, MARPAT and other versions |
![]() |
| | #1 |
| | Digital camouflage: CADPAT, MARPAT and other versions info![]() CADPAT ![]() MARPAT woodland ![]() MARPAT desert ![]() Finnish digital camo m/05, similar to CADPAT and "fishing season" seems to be opened (boonie hat). SA-kuva http://tietokannat.mil.fi/harma04/in...d=80&width=640 Digital snow suit m/05, SA-kuva |
![]() | |
| |
| | #2 |
| |
I like the CADPAT. But the MARPAT may be better... after all when you hit the dirt, there should be some brown on your cammies.
|
| | #3 |
| |
MARPAT is probably more effective, because what the U.S. did was take CADPAT and improve it... Still the CADPAT is pretty effective itself
|
| | #4 |
| |
MARPAT looks like its more effective...certainly more so than the old woodlands and 3-color deserts.
Lieutenant Junior Grade, USN |
| | #5 |
| |
I'd say it would depend on where you are. Marpat looks like it would be more effective in areas that have more "angular" vegetation like pine forests. Something like cadpat or the german flecktarn look like it would be better in areas with "rounder" vegetation.
~Kinection |
| | #6 |
| |
CADPAT TW is very effective in dense wood, but the MARPAT woodland would be better for lighter wood and brush. Hmm....you seem to have left out the CADPAT AR (Arid Region) It's just the same CADPAT layout, but with the 3 shades of brown. MCpl K. Steliga Ground Controller Wing Operations/Air Traffic Control 14 Wing Greenwood Royal Canadian Air Force Per ardua ad astra |
| | #7 |
| |
i think some pictures of soldiers in the field wearing the old BDU's vs the new BDU's would give a better perspective on what is more effective. ![]() http://www.hyperstealth.com/camo/faq/ someone supplied that link before in a different thread when digi camo was brought up. it had a lot of good information. Flavius Vegetius Renatus De Rei Militari - Let him who desires peace prepare for war. Hard work doesn't guarantee success, but without it you don't have a chance. - Alex Rodriguez (Go Yankees!) |
| | #8 |
| |
Any CADPAT in itself is effective, because it scatters your vision and you can't focus at close range. I personally like CADPAT better than MARPAT. My DCO is ordering all our senior NCOs CADPAT for the new year.
WO2 Trevor Perry, Squadron Deputy Commander 746 Lightning Hawk RCACS |
| | #9 |
| |
well according to the website i listed the digital patterns are only effective within 100 yards or less. farther than that the colors don't blend the same.
|
| | #10 |
| |
The main idea for CADPAT is close-range combat anyways.
|
![]() |