| |
| | Post 1 |
| Immunes | Post; Did Japan take the right option?I was wondering, did the Japanese take the right option? As part of the Axis pact Why couldn't they just declare war on Britain and the Netherlands and then attack Malaya and East Indies and Australia? Their ultimate goals were oil, rubber,and raw materials,I think they could have given the Philippines or any other American base a wide berth. America put the oil sanctions on when the Japanese moved into French Indo China [virtually guaranteeing war], but made no other move. Of course the Japanese would be taking a big chance of America declaring war and hitting them with the Pacific fleet and they weren't prepaired to take that chance. But would America have declared war? |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Banned ![]() | Bloody oath they didn't. I think there were some Japanese at the time who thought attacking Pearl Harbour was completely crazy as it would bring the US up against them. I agree with you Ashes. They should have taken some other options. I guess the tantalizing chance of destroying most of the US fleet and so keeping the US out of the western Pacific was just too great an attraction for the Japanese High Command. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | a lot of things could have happened in the past, but the moment the government became overly greedy; everything started to go down hill.
__________________ on a permanent vacation....will visit every now and then. see arcade hidden message!!! Life is short and pointless, be happy and live it. |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Immunes | I think Japan should have not attacked the US because at the time the US had an Isolationist attitude and would probably not have entered the war until much later. If Japan had waited it would have not been seriously hurt.
__________________ And when he gets to heaven, To Saint Peter he will tell: One more soldier reporting, sir-- I\'ve served my time in h**l. -Marine Grave inscription on Guadalcanal, 1942 |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | They could have at least attacked while the carriers were there... But the whole idea was hairbrained in the first place. |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Milites Gregarius | That would have been a more sensible route, but evidently they thought their gains would not hold unless they knocked out the US. Perhaps they had a fear of the "white races" sticking together, and underestimated the very real differences even between the US and the British.
__________________ The J-8 Shop Wargame Rules, Variants, and Orders of Battle http://www.geocities.com/pmj6/ |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Immunes | I think that if a war would rage across the Pacific and all American possesions would be ringed by Japanese waters it wouldn't exatly favour the Americans. If these had happened there would surley also be enough "incidents" or Lusitanias for the USA to go to war. And when they did they would probably still have the entire Pacific fleet ![]() |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Immunes | The Axis was planning a joint invasion of the Soviet Union. If Japan would have attacked the Soviet Union when Germany did, instead of the United States, the Red Army wouldn't have been able to stop them. Great Britain may have been the only country fighting the Axis. America might not have gotten into the war because we were still being isolationists. So no, they didn't make the right choice.
__________________ ![]() \"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference, and our Marines don\'t have that problem.\" - President Ronald Reagan, 1985 |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | They made a very poor choice. But you must remember that the Japanese were affraid of the Russians after Zukuv gave them a beating once...
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 10 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
__________________ No Voice | |
| |