About Destruction and Civilian Victims of the Amer Aggression in Iraq
|April 23rd, 2006||#1|
| || |
Destruction and Civilian Victims of the Amer Aggression in Iraq info
Pictures of Destruction and Civilian Victims of the American Aggression in Iraq(March / April 2003)Please note that some of these pictures are not suitable for small children and those who have weak hearts. The following photos are only of a very tiny fraction of the thousands of Iraqi Civilian Victims who have been terrorised, humiliated, injured, maimed and killed through American Bombing of civilian areas in various cities of Iraq. Due to insecurity, Independent Reporters could not and still can not reach many areas to photograph and report the atrocities. Even after the bombing had stopped, thousands of civilians continue to suffer and die due to their severe injuries. We kindly request Independent News Reporters to send us photos of the American atrocities in Iraq for inclusion on these pages.
countless iraqi prisoner were being held in secrete detention center.
Last edited by RnderSafe; April 24th, 2006 at 17:14.. Reason: Do not double post
|April 24th, 2006||#2|
| || |
What is exactly the question behind the post? I, and I reckon so do many Americans, know that the civilians are the great losers in the conflict. They get shot at by the Allies, they get shot at by the insurgents and bombed by both parties.... It is sad and tragic. So it would hel[p the conversation/discussion if you stated which way you want to go on this one.
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
Sir Winston Churchill
|April 24th, 2006||#4|
| || |
Hey, kid, your agenda is showing.
You also don't have a credible source.
Isn't there some rule about graphic photos and something about posting double posts in succession? Moderators?
Ut ceteri vivant.
|April 24th, 2006||#6|
| || |
Anglo is derived from anglo-saxon, which was rooted in the north-western part of Europe...read as: England. So when they talk about Anglo-American relations they mean these two countries.
|April 24th, 2006||#8|
| || |
There is no point to this thread other than a childish tit for tat mentality. Being unable to form a logical argument she instead resorts to posting graphic sensationalist pictures from a source which is as biased as possible... something that could never be seen from China were it photos of Falun Gong victims of the Security Bureau of China.
War is hell and guess what... people get killed.
Now Achinese are you trying to imply that American and other coalition forces in Iraq have purposefully targetted innocent civilians?
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
|April 24th, 2006||#9|
| || |
im only blaim american who start it for its own selfish interest(oil)
these picture were just a tip of iceburger. not to mention the secretly held detention center.
I don't know what are those u.s. sponsored human right groups for in front of this biggest ever human right violation. while never forget to make big headline for their so called "evil other country" violation .
Last edited by achinese; April 24th, 2006 at 13:25..
|April 24th, 2006||#10|
| || |
I will say though, if any detention center is "secret," you won't know about it.
Also, I challenge you to proof that the war in Iraq is about only about oil. Please provide hardline facts.
I personally believe you have an agenda and no real interest in what you're discussing, and I think it stems from the posts about China. As Bulldogg says, this seems a little tit-for-tat. You feel someone has smeared mud on your country, and you want to return the favor. Maybe that isn't the case, but that's how your topic and posts ring.