| |
| | Post 21 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
Also, if you'll note, no where did I deny that oil isn't a factor. So, what are ya preaching for?
__________________ Ugh. Last edited by PJ24; April 25th, 2006 at 23:11. | |
| |
| | Post 22 |
| Primus Pilus | Good grief. Pictures from Abu Ghraib and even some video of British troops beating civilians. ![]() The US should be held responsible for all the deaths in Iraq whether they be from US weapons or from insurgents, right? Right?! |
| |
| | Post 23 | |
| Forums Grumpy Old Man | Quote:
A real blast ......... RIGHT?
__________________ Fair winds and following seas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ![]() < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < and long may your big jib draw. -W.R.B. (Chief Bones) FCC(SW) USN(RET)- | |
| |
| | Post 24 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
I don't think that oil is the sole reason for this war, but I do think it plays an important part. In my opinion it would be fine if it would be acknowledged as such.
__________________ A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill | |
| |
| | Post 25 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Post; Read your PMsachinese, please read your PMs ASAP (as soon as possible).
__________________ "I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier." To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post. |
| |
| | Post 26 |
| Optio | I think the reason why a fair number of conspiracy people think the war in iraq was about oil was because there was little other reason to invade iraq. True theres no piece of paper that says "Lets invade iraq for oil" but when u sit back and have a wee think about it, what did the american administration have to gain from invading iraq? Saddam was a threat and had WMD ready to blow up the west? Load of bollocks! There was little if not no threat and the american intelligence knew that.Iran and north korea were and still are much more threatining. Invade for peace and democracy? Spreading democracy and freedom is all very nice but if that was the primary reason then the administration should be invading a lot more countries right now. Al-qaeda? Bin Laden and sadam were not the best of friends (Unlike Rummy and sadam ain the eighties) besides, he was still thought to be in afghanistan/pakistan Whats left in the equation? Oil and a bigger and better base of operations in the middle east. Its true that if the middle east didn't have oil, quite frankly the West would treat the region just like africa. To be honest though, securing the economic interests of your country is understandable but when the administartion puts peoples lives on the line for poor excuses then questions do have to be asked. I'l fully support the US troops in iraq and afghanistan, they're doing their jobs and doing them bloody well. I just hate how the adminstration have used them this way, America deserves more than a bunch of greedy tits whose diversion into iraq in the "war on terror" is on the way to causing more deaths - civilian and military then were produced on 9/11. Its not right, Bush and his pals are failing America and the rest of the world. It is pretty obvious that oil is a big factor here people and i'm definitely no hippy or conspicracy theory junkie |
| |
| | Post 27 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | We're not really gonna open this dung heap again are we?
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| |
| | Post 28 |
| Optio | I guess its all been said before, apologies for that people. Theres only one thing to do now: Jequirity is off to the pub |
| |