| |
| | Post 1 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Post; Depleted uraniumWe have many ground pounders on this board so I want to ask, is it ok with you morally and personally to use depleted uranium rounds knowing you or some other soldier will have to occupy the ground? The AirForce pilots and the generals who make these decisions never have to be at ground zero and brave the exposure themselves, what do you think?
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| |
| | Post 2 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
http://www.idust.ne
__________________ ![]() The waves of the ocean arrives before to this mountain than the romansī arms Corocotta, Cantabrian warrior (century I B.C) | |
| |
| | Post 3 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Post; Re: Depleted uraniumQuote:
Don't put on the Aviators they fire whats loaded and what R&D comes up with. And frankly if an Armored Infantry Bn in BMP's or a Company of T 72's is rolling up my position and CAS from A10's, firing UD rounds is gonna take em off me I'm clearing that Flyboy hot. UD rounds might cause health problems. But 7.62, 12.7mm or MBT main gun rounds will most definently cause an adverse effect on me and mine.
__________________ Sgt. Rafael Peralta ,United States Marine Corps Company A, 1st Bn, 3rd Marine Regt, 3rd Marine Divison We will never forget your valor and sacrifice. Semper Fi ! | |
| |
| | Post 4 | ||
| Primus Pilus | Post; Re: Depleted uraniumQuote:
| ||
| |
| | Post 5 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Post; Re: Depleted uraniumQuote:
My first responsibilty is to my Marines and will use whatever asset is available to protect them. I don't have the time or inclination to ask a Pilot what type ordanance they have and decide if I want to use. That's a luxarey that you don't have when the Feces hit the fan | |
| |
| | Post 6 | ||
| Primus Pilus | Post; Re: Depleted uraniumQuote:
| ||
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | An Infantry View Point was what was asked for. Thats what I gave. |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | In a Combat Situation that's about the size of it. My Marines would be not only my first concern but my only concern. I would never sacrifice any Marine with me because I was worried about a potential enviromental effect. Their lives at that moment are more important. Do really believe any leader would say. "Sorry guys. I gotta flight of A-10's on station ...... but. Ya see they are firing UD rounds and I'm worried about possible adverse effects and all. So I'm gonna let that Company of T-72's roll over us. Die in place fellas." Get real |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Buttercup ![]() | In the same vein, at the beginning of OIF I saw a couple editorials condemning the 3 ID's move across the desert because it was "destroying the fragile environment" of the region. I have never been in a situation where I had to consider that question, bulldog, and I am not Infantry, but at this stage (and I do not ever see this opinion changing) I am entirely on the same page as 03, rather than a moral question it is more one of survival, and until the R&D guys come up with some new Buck Rogers munition to replace UD rounds, I plan to make use of them whenever necessary.
__________________ No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen. |
| |