Topic: Democrat NJ Attorney General resigns in Scandal 3

Stripesgamer.com


Click Here to Join us Today!
FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
August 24th, 2006   Post 21
Missileer
Nuclear Duck Hunter
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
And Clinton actually impeached for not controling his sexual behavior

LoL
No, he was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Judge. Being a lawyer, I can't imagine that he thought he could get away with that.
__________________



“War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.”
—John Stuart Mill
 
August 24th, 2006   Post 22
mmarsh
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by Missileer
No, he was impeached for lying under oath to a Federal Judge. Being a lawyer, I can't imagine that he thought he could get away with that.
This is not a defense of his behavior, but he really never actually practiced law. He got his degree and based his BAR exam, but he went directly into politics afterward. The closest he got was when he was made the AG of Arkansas, but ADGvery rarely prosecute cases personally. And he only stayed AG for less than 2 years.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html
__________________
"My center is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent. I shall attack." -Foch

I get this question a lot. I am from NYC. I fly a French flag because I work for the Paris Office of a International company.
 
August 24th, 2006   Post 23
Chief Bones
Forums Grumpy Old Man
 
 
Gear


This absolutely cracks me up ... there are still people out there that are angry that the Republicans impeached Clinton but were unable to remove him from office. And for what ... a little sexual encounter between consenting adults (oh yeah - lying about it) ... something that ANYONE would do.
HOW SAD.
 
August 25th, 2006   Post 24
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by mmarsh
This is not a defense of his behavior, but he really never actually practiced law. He got his degree and based his BAR exam, but he went directly into politics afterward. The closest he got was when he was made the AG of Arkansas, but ADGvery rarely prosecute cases personally. And he only stayed AG for less than 2 years.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/bc42.html
For whatever reason your beloved idol was impeached for real... It's shameful how people defend that man who did nothing to destroy the enemies of the US and kept on asking for illegal and shameful stuff from his female staff in the office
 
August 25th, 2006   Post 25
Chief Bones
Forums Grumpy Old Man
 
 
Gear



Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
For whatever reason your beloved idol was impeached for real... It's shameful how people defend that man who did nothing to destroy the enemies of the US and kept on asking for illegal and shameful stuff from his female staff in the office
P80
He is NOT my idol ... I just believe that his peccadilloes are not/were not as constitutionally as dangerous as some of the charges that are being leveled at GW. Slick Willy lied about a sexual encounter between consenting adults. The fact that any man WOULD lie about something like this seemed to be beyond the circling vultures that were in the House and Senate at the time (Republicans). Now we look at King GW Bush and we see him violating the very wiretap law that SCOTUS has ruled on so many many times - the ruling states it is against the law and the constitution to carry out a wiretapping operation without a valid warrant and probable cause. Keep in mind that this is the same person (GW), that has signed more signing statements than ALL the rest of the presidents down through history. Evidently GW believes he is beyond the law and ONLY has to obey the laws he agrees with.

NOW - these same vultures (Republican), act as though nothing is wrong.

I guess that honor, integrity and honesty are ONLY important to the Republicans and the Republican Party when they are going after a sitting Democratic President.
 
August 25th, 2006   Post 26
Ted
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Bones
This absolutely cracks me up ... there are still people out there that are angry that the Republicans impeached Clinton but were unable to remove him from office. And for what ... a little sexual encounter between consenting adults (oh yeah - lying about it) ... something that ANYONE would do.
HOW SAD.
Hahahaha Chief, isn't that what makes us men? The biblical urge to go forth and spawn our seeds... Clinton should have used that quote to his defence, that would have gotten the Democrats lots of extra constituents from Bible Belt !
 
August 25th, 2006   Post 27
mmarsh
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
For whatever reason your beloved idol was impeached for real... It's shameful how people defend that man who did nothing to destroy the enemies of the US and kept on asking for illegal and shameful stuff from his female staff in the office
Phoneix01

He wasn't my idol, I idolize nobody but my parents. He was a far better president than the person we have now. Clinton popularity IS NEARLY DOUBLE this current *president* (I use the term lightly). You can spin that as much as you want, but thats the truth.

Secondly you are rewritting history. Lewenski has stated that it was SHE that chased him, not the other way around. As Chief Bones stated, consentual sex amongst adults is not illegal. This isnt Iran, its not even illegal to cheat on your wife. Clinton's impeachment wasnt really about sex or even lying to a judge, the underlying reason why he was impeached was because the minority in power disliked his political policies and wanted him out of office. It was nothing more than a thinly-veiled coup d'etat. It failed.

And to once again paraphrase the Chief, whatever crimes Clinton was accused of pales in comparison to some of thing things Bush has done.

Last edited by mmarsh; August 25th, 2006 at 16:40..
 
August 25th, 2006   Post 28
WarMachine
Primus Pilus
 
 
I'm just surprised the republicans who are more about traditional values rather than christian or neocon ones are still going along with GW's dismal plans.

I like the idea of a balanced budget, and concentrating on domestic affairs. I'm not that enthusiastic about tax cuts for the rich and government deregulation and of the economy. I have a mixed bag of values and i think most people do as well.

I'm just wondering why the republicans are shifting towards doing more harm than good for themselves these days. I know the dems have their problems too, but i'd rather have them acting as a counter to bush than his own party which hasn't done anything except let him ruin everything he touches.
__________________
bella! Horrida bella!
War! Horrid war!

There are no warlike people, just warlike leaders
 
August 26th, 2006   Post 29
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by mmarsh
Phoneix01

He wasn't my idol, I idolize nobody but my parents. He was a far better president than the person we have now. Clinton popularity IS NEARLY DOUBLE this current *president* (I use the term lightly). You can spin that as much as you want, but thats the truth.

Secondly you are rewritting history. Lewenski has stated that it was SHE that chased him, not the other way around. As Chief Bones stated, consentual sex amongst adults is not illegal. This isnt Iran, its not even illegal to cheat on your wife. Clinton's impeachment wasnt really about sex or even lying to a judge, the underlying reason why he was impeached was because the minority in power disliked his political policies and wanted him out of office. It was nothing more than a thinly-veiled coup d'etat. It failed.

And to once again paraphrase the Chief, whatever crimes Clinton was accused of pales in comparison to some of thing things Bush has done.
LoL, give me a break...

Minority in power? What are you trying to imply by that? I can't help laughing at you guys for being so un-educated about your own country's history though.

Clintoon was a weak person who cared more for money than national interests of the United States.

By the way, I am starting to wonder if some people are suffering from BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome)... LMAO
 
August 27th, 2006   Post 30
Ted
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
LoL, give me a break...

Minority in power? What are you trying to imply by that? I can't help laughing at you guys for being so un-educated about your own country's history though.
Mmarsh is implying the this moral fanatic Star was chasing Clinton because of the stalemate between and Republican congress and a Democratic president. What do you think Mmarsh is implying?

Fortunatly un-education is easily fixed but your blind dismissal of some affairs and facts might not be so easily fixable.
 



Similar Threads
Lawyers, Disorder in the Court.......
Radio Interview with General Reinwald
Iran has nuclear weapon;by Russian general
Argentine bishop resigns amid reported sex scandal
Mexico's Fox Fires Attorney General (Reuters)