| |
Topic: Current American Recon Plane | |
   |
|
| View Poll Results :What do you think the current US Recon plane looks like? | |||
| Flying Wing |    | 3 | 17.65% |
| Standard Shape |    | 3 | 17.65% |
| Flying Saucer |    | 1 | 5.88% |
| No Idea |    | 3 | 17.65% |
| Something Else |    | 7 | 41.18% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| |
October 17th, 2004
| Post 1 |
| Spam King | Post; Current American Recon PlaneWhat do you think the plane (that is obviously in replacement of the SR-71) looks like?
__________________ I've known hunger, I know thirst, lived the best and seen the worst, but the only way I know how to finish is to finish first! Everybody's talkin' at me I can't hear a word they're sayin' Just driving around in Jon Voight's car |
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 2 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Something along the lines of an F-117.
__________________ WO2 Trevor Perry, Squadron Deputy Commander 746 Lightning Hawk RCACS |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 3 |
| Banned  | more like the auroa if it exists. |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 4 |
| Primus Pilus | Are you guys out of your mind, the SR-71 was a great plane but it has been out of commission for years and they still use the U-2, and UAV's, then of course the Satellites.
__________________ Honour.... Courage.... Commitment US Naval Academy \"Non sibi sed patriae!\" (Not for self, but country) US Navy |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 5 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius  | Sightings of the Aurora (not sure what the official military designation is)claim it triangular in shape, but the top brass are doing a pretty thorough job of keep a tight lid on things so we got know way to know for certain.
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 6 | |
| Banned | Quote:
yeah but what do you think thier spy plane in production/in design looks like. so wha?t they use the u2 and UAV's and satalites ,i wont go into listing thier bad points, that doesnt mean they dont use a diffrent stealth plane. | |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 7 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | I think it's a kind of a flying wing. It is by far the most efficient flying shape.
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED  Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2004
| Post 8 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | That's a pretty big generalization. "Efficient", how do you define that for flying terms? Each aircraft is designed differently for a different job. |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004
| Post 9 |
| Fridgeraider (Instructor) | Efficient as in, it'll fly for much longer, has less air drag, therefore potential for the best range... probably the best service ceiling depending on the engine. Not to mention, it could fly VERY fast. |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2004
| Post 10 |
| Spam King | Uh, HELLO?  The SR-71 is the fastest known Jet in World History. It's not a flying Wing. I did some research and found that the SR-71 Could outfly a 30 caliber Rifle Bullet. |
|
|
