Topic: Could've the ussr been better under trotsky?

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
April 8th, 2005   Post 1
WarMachine
Primus Pilus
 
 

Post; Could've the ussr been better under trotsky?


When lenin was in charge of the bolsheviks, he didn't seem to mind some free market reforms. But after the power struggle follwing his death, stalin really twisted the communist system into a totalarianist state that more or less remained so until its collapse. If trotsky was in charge, more likely he would've have demonstrated to the world that communism wasn't so bad and wasn't about tyranny. So many people wouldn't have died of famine, the nazis may not have been in power if htere was no conceived threat of communism, and the soviets would've been a much more motivated country without constant fear from above threatening them.
 
April 8th, 2005   Post 2
Charge 7
Master Gunner
 
 
Any of the Bolsheviks would've been better than Stalin. Hitler killed 20 million Russians, but Stalin more than doubled that.
__________________
"Do not forget your dogs of war, your big guns, which are the most-to-be respected arguments of the rights of kings."

- Frederick the Great, King of Prussia

 
April 8th, 2005   Post 3
Corocotta
Primus Pilus
 
 
Lennin was as bad a Stalin. He created the GULAG, the rusian concentration camps.
__________________


“The waves of the ocean arrives before to this mountain than the romans´ arms”


Corocotta, Cantabrian warrior (century I B.C)
 
April 8th, 2005   Post 4
godofthunder9010
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Anything is better than Stalin's regime. Trotsky would have continued with some of Lenin's brutal methods and the whole ideology of establishing Communism is pretty brutal to begin with. But Stalin was paranoid and had a strong tendency to murder and purge when he had any doubts about ... anyone. How could you do worse?
__________________
"It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it."
- General Robert E. Lee
Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!!

"It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase
 
April 11th, 2005   Post 5
Italian Guy
Milforum Hitman
 
 
Gear

I think noone could say. Stalin was for sure one of the worst men ever existed . Lenin for his part was a very bad guy and like Stauro said he created the Gulags etc. Trotsky was a semi-paranoid too. At least Stalin stopped trying to export communism to Europe for a while.
__________________
"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it".
Pericles.


 
April 11th, 2005   Post 6
Corocotta
Primus Pilus
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010
Anything is better than Stalin's regime. Trotsky would have continued with some of Lenin's brutal methods and the whole ideology of establishing Communism is pretty brutal to begin with. But Stalin was paranoid and had a strong tendency to murder and purge when he had any doubts about ... anyone. How could you do worse?
In Spain we have a proverb that says: " It is better a bad man known rather than a good one unknown."
 
April 11th, 2005   Post 7
CABAL
Primus Pilus
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by staurofilakes
Lennin was as bad a Stalin. He created the GULAG, the rusian concentration camps.
The one of the many reasons why Lenin created GULAG is to supress Political Opponents and to silence anyone still loyal to the Czar. The threat against Lenin's Leadership was real. Stalin's reasons to eliminate and dismantle the Soviet Beaurucracy were paranoid, so therefore it is positive that Stalin was surely more ruthless than Lenin. Thus, Stalin's schemes were done on a larger scale.
__________________


Cogito ergo sum