| |
| | Post 11 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | It is complicated to exsplain how they did it realy. |
| |
| | Post 12 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
ya know, you get the drift.
__________________ \"The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.\" | |
| |
| | Post 13 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
The transition of the US Army from tiny to huge: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWusaA.htm Quote:
Now we know that the USSR had a minimum of 10,000,000 men in the Red Army as of 1939, more than 10,000 tanks and more than 10,000 combat aircraft. They had a much more developed concept of Mechanized and Tank Warfare. So ... I think the winner of a battle on land is ridiculously obvious -- the USSR would win easily. The winner on the Seas would have been the USA though because of the substatial buildup -- mostly in the Pacific, thus thwarting the best entry point into the United States -- Alaska.
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase | |
| |
| | Post 14 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii |
Thats true, The USA would have been defended thanks to thier Navy, however if the troops had made it ina large enough numbers the USA would have been in trouble.
|
| |
| | Post 15 |
| Optio |
1930's No 1920's Yes |
| |
| | Post 16 |
| Immunes |
1939 YES (just before the war) 1930 YES 1920 YES |
| |
| | Post 17 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
So you're saying that the USA could have taken the USSR in 1939? 1930 too? I'd love to hear how we'd have pulled that off. Please do share.
|
| |
| | Post 18 |
| Immunes |
No lol ofcourse not, its the opposite way around
|
| |
| | Post 19 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
I don't know about the early 20's, but for the rest of the period between world wars, the United States would have only been able to check any invasion forces with the US Navy. On the ground, its an easy question. USSR would beat the crap out of the USA because we did not have a built up Army. Interesting thought. The fact that the Soviets couldn't likely successfully invade for a substantial time period (if ever), what happens when the USA starts up a wartime production economy? That's as close as you can come to making the contest all that interesting. | |
| |
| | Post 20 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii |
The USA could have probably wistand a Russian Invasion in 1920, not cause of Military size but because Russia was coming out of a take over and it would be hard to get the military together to fight .
|
| |