| |
Topic: Could these be military emplacements? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Click Here to Join us Today! FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery |
|
| View Poll Results :What are these[ http://giza-cydonia.com ] anomalous Giza Plateau Structures | |||
| Obviously Military Emplacements | | 0 | 0% |
| Not related to the Military | | 1 | 33.33% |
| Can't Say | | 2 | 66.67% |
| Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| |
| | Post 1 |
| Tirones | Post; Could these be military emplacements?Last edited by roger_penrose; November 19th, 2008 at 03:31.. |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
They possibly could be old disused SAM sites. That's my best guess.
__________________ "Those with ulterior motives may tell you what you wish to hear, but a real friend tells you what you need to know" http://www.geocities.com/senojekips/Index.htm Last edited by senojekips; November 19th, 2008 at 00:49.. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tirones |
When did SAM technology become popular? Are SAM sites usually this big - around 150m*150m? What purpose do you think the circular structures would have served? What about Site 4? Also how likely do you consider that these are unrelated to the military?
Last edited by roger_penrose; November 19th, 2008 at 00:58.. |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
Google for SAM Sites, from what I see they look absolutely typical in both size and layout. SAM sites can be as big as is needed depending on the number of missiles deployed, the revetments are only 25m inside diameter and would be ideal they also have a break for vehicular access. Why do you ask, this is not what one would call unusual in a country using Russky AA defence systems, if you bother to look you'll probably find them all around Egyptian cities where they have not been destroyed. |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Je suis aware |
Can't see the picture.
|
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Immunes |
Me neither.
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Milites Gregarius |
Wish i could see...
|
| |