| |
Topic: Could the Royal Navy alone prevent any German invasion of Britain during 1940? |
![]() ![]() ![]() Click Here to Join us Today! FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery |
|
![]() |
| |
| | Post 1 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; Could the Royal Navy alone prevent any German invasion of Britain during 1940?
__________________ Adversus solem ne loquitor Last edited by BritinAfrica; February 11th, 2009 at 10:32.. |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
With out air power the Royal Navy would have been badly hit by the Stuka's.
__________________ LeEnfield Rides again |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii |
Probably not, assuming the state of the German navy remained similar to that after the invasion of Norway. In fact we can look to Norway and Crete to some extent to examine what it would have been like without air-power. Half decent planning and preparation in any of these cases should have gave the Germans a much Bloodier nose than they actually got, both were Pyhrric victories. They couldn't afford another one. However, if Germany would have concentrated their resources against Britain rather than attacking the Soviet Union perhaps they could have cut off the convoys, bomb the commercial shipping ports and quickly build Eboats to protect their supplies for a cross channel invasion around 1942. Judging by the complications during D-day, and the stubbornness of the Royal Navy, a landing would have been no easy feat though.
__________________ At the sign of the unholy three commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unholy_three.png Last edited by perseus; February 11th, 2009 at 13:50.. |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
I also believe that when we talk of the RAF being defeated in the Battle of Britain we are really only talking about the Luftwaffe gaining air superiority over the potential invasion areas of southern Britain as they simply did not have the long range fighter available to gain total air superiority, because of this I believe that any landings would have still been contested by the RAF from bases further north.
__________________ We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld | |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Primus Pilus |
Would it have been possible for the Germans to assemble a flotilla basically equal to what the allies used on D day. Then, with the Navy that they had at the time, screen it and supply landing support to the invasion? I think the British Navy would have played hell with the flotila. I would think the burning ships and constantly shifting of vessels would make it hard for the Luftwaffe to distinguish targets. Especially if destroyers were laying smoke and maneuvering threw the flotilla against lightly protected barges, troop carriers, and supply ships. I also think the RAF while hurting badly could do a lot of damage to the flotilla while ignoring German war ships. I think the D Day invasion was infinitely more successful because it was unopposed. There was no significant German Navy or Air Force to do much damage. |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
Given the situation at the time, the invasion would have established a beach head and porbably got to London - after that who knows? By the way has anyone read SS-GB by Len Deighton, nice take on the possibility. | |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii |
A lot of interesting points have been raised. I think the tenacity of the RN would have made such an impact on invading forces, that such an attack would in all probability fail even if the Luftwaffe had command of the air. But then Monty raised a good point regarding the other groups in fighter command to the north, but also 10 group in the west of England. However, had the German forces actually managed to get boots on the ground in England, they would have faced tremendous opposistion not only from what ground troops that were left, but from the civil population. Also lets not forget the thousands of WW1 vets who were more then capable of giving a good account of themselves. I recall a situation during the German invasion of Norway, members of a Norwegian rifle club caused so many casualties among the invading forces, they were forced to pull back and regroup. |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| Primus Pilus |
Dont think so. Though the British Navy has always been pushing the envelope, it can only go so far. Without strong, sturdy air support, i dont think the Navy would have been able to stop a large invasion. Though a small-medium one might be a struggle, they could have pulled it off. |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius |
They certainly could not have done much about an airborne invasion, a la Crete.
__________________ "Those with ulterior motives may tell you what you wish to hear, but a real friend tells you what you need to know" http://www.geocities.com/senojekips/Index.htm |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Centurion |
I guess that this is the staunch British supporter in me coming out, with a touch of reality. Yes the Germans could and would've got boots on the ground. Could it have been sustained - I think not. I am proud of my nation but do have our down side - stubborn and obdurate amongst them; for this reason I feel that the UK (& I mean all of it) would have been a counter insurgency nightmare to the Germans. |
| |