Topic: Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1996-2003

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
August 30th, 2005   Post 1
SwordFish_13
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 

Post; Conventional Arms Transfers to Developing Nations, 1996-2003


Hi,

http://www.fpc.state.gov/documents/o...tion/35975.pdf

Quote:
Source:BASIC

Key Points

* The United States, the United Kingdom and Russia dominated the global arms market in 2003 according to an annual study released recently by the U.S. Congressional Research Service (CRS).

* In 2003, the value of all conventional arms transfer agreements globally was more than $25.6 billion - the third straight year that the value of worldwide arms deals declined (down from $41 billion in 2000). The value of deliveries also declined to $28.7 billion in 2003, a decrease of about 31 percent from 2002.

* The United States ($13.7 billion) and the United Kingdom ($4.7 billion) accounted for almost two-thirds of the value of global arms delivered in 2003.

* Between 1996 and 2003, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council were also the top five suppliers of conventional weapons (by value of agreements) to developing countries. The United States, Russia, France, China and the United Kingdom were responsible for a total of $118.1 billion worth of arms transfer agreements to developing countries from 1996 to 2003.

* Taken together, the United States and the United Kingdom were responsible for 61 percent of the value of all arms deliveries made to developing countries in 2003.

* In the post Cold War arms industry, so often talked about as a "buyer's market," all the indications point to an increasingly favorable environment for recipients, undermining the utility of arms transfers as a tool of political influence.

Peace
-=SF_13=-
 
August 31st, 2005   Post 2
tomtom22
Chief Engineer
 
 
Gear

What's the point of this post, Swordfish?
Aside from the points cited in your quote, which I confirmed by reading the cited doc on the website posted, what is your point here?
__________________
"It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations
 
August 31st, 2005   Post 3
SwordFish_13
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Hi,

Umm the US Department of State's Annual report was released So maybe Someone would be Interested in reading it ..........




Peace
-=SF_31=-
 
August 31st, 2005   Post 4
Shadowalker
Primus Pilus
 
 
Its interesting to read, i hadnt realised the arms market was shrinking so much, also that the UAE and egypt were so active in getting weapons.
 
September 3rd, 2005   Post 5
texasrebel211
Optio
 
There will always be a market for arms either from countries or groups of fighters.
__________________
\"We cannot be so fixated to preserve the rights of everyday Americas.\" Bill Clinton
 
September 5th, 2005   Post 6
WARmachine88
Banned
 
and there are always arm contractors because this arm trading is just so profitable.