Topic: Combat boots 2

Stripesgamer.com


Click Here to Join us Today!
FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology
User Name
Password

 
June 25th, 2009   Post 11
03USMC
Milforum Moderator
 
 
Gear


Standard issue or Danners. The USMC Spec boots that Bates makes are also okay but the above pair is a lower grade and the sole will seperate from the upper if you use them hard.
__________________
Sgt. Rafael Peralta ,United States Marine Corps
Company A, 1st Bn, 3rd Marine Regt, 3rd Marine Divison

We will never forget your valor and sacrifice.

Semper Fi !
 
June 25th, 2009   Post 12
the_13th_redneck
Je suis aware
 
 
Gear

Inferior glue? Or does the rubber actually tear off?
__________________

I sold my soul to the devil, and the price was cheap.
 
June 25th, 2009   Post 13
abel_wang
Tirones
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03USMC
They'll fall apart on you in about 4 months
Why do u say that? I feel it's more comfortable than some military boots in the cold weather, such as Belleville 500, Bates 85501, etc. Of course, not very durable . Because it is for the civil market.

Last edited by abel_wang; June 25th, 2009 at 06:48..
 
June 28th, 2009   Post 14
the_13th_redneck
Je suis aware
 
 
Gear

Durability is very important because I don't want my boots falling apart while I'm in the middle of doing something important.
 
4 Weeks Ago   Post 15
PatientZero
Tirones
 
 
The above bates model is based on cementing construction, from the looks of it, relies only on chemical adhesive.. dual density outsole.. possible phylon + rubber.. or.. *gulp* PU + rubber.

From my trial and error so far, there is no feasible chemical adhesive that could match the bonding strength of the good ol' vulcanized shoe construction (avg 100kg tear strength, same construction with the standard issue), at least not without additional upper to sole bonding method.