![]() | About Cold war question - Nuclear exchange |
![]() |
| | #1 |
| | Cold war question - Nuclear exchange info |
![]() | |
| |
| | #2 |
| |
Probably only the delusional.
|
| | #3 |
| |
The Short answer is, No,... that's why the policy was called "Mutually Assured Destruction".
|
| | #4 |
| |
That's why they tried so hard to avoid Nuclear War.
I'm the bleeding heart liberal your mother warned you about. ![]() |
| | #5 |
| |
I'm familiar with the conceopt of MAD. Surely someone in Soviet High Command thought, " I think we could win this thing".
|
| | #6 |
| |
None of us are qualified remote viewers and even they couldn't answer that question for you.
|
| | #7 |
| |
There's little sense in "winning" if you are dead, or trapped underground in a bunker for the next 100 years or so.
Last edited by senojekips; June 13th, 2008 at 21:46.. |
| | #8 | |
| | Quote:
MCpl K. Steliga Ground Controller Wing Operations/Air Traffic Control 14 Wing Greenwood Royal Canadian Air Force Per ardua ad astra | |
| | #9 |
| |
Wasn't it China who thought they could win any nuclear exchange, because of the numbers game?
English by the grace of God. |
| | #10 |
| |
In 1982 I heard from a Navy Captain who used to command a submarine that we could win a limited Nuclear war with the Soviet Union. HOWEVER, after sitting in the El Morocco bar in Naples talking with a Soviet sailor I seriously doubt either side would have own. No Mutual destruction, just mutual death.
|
![]() |