Topic: Which was Churchill's biggest wartime blunder? 5

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > World War 1 to World War 2 Forum
User Name
Password

 
January 6th, 2007   Post 41
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Politics (and absolute necessity), makes for strange bedfellows.

The fact that they worked together against a common enemy doesn't mean that Winnie trusted Stalin, (or vice versa).
 
March 2nd, 2007   Post 42
Lord Londonderry
Banned
 
So true. Winnie never trusted Joe.
 
March 18th, 2007   Post 43
Young Winston
Banned
 
 
Churchill was an amazing man, even after considering his faults.
 
March 26th, 2007   Post 44
sven hassell
Centurion
 
 
The sinking of The Prince of Wales and The Repulse.Churchill still believed in the supremacy of big battleships over that of aircraft carriers.
__________________
 
May 25th, 2007   Post 45
Strongbow
Banned
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sven hassell
The sinking of The Prince of Wales and The Repulse.Churchill still believed in the supremacy of big battleships over that of aircraft carriers.
Yes, it was a terrible blow to Churchill.

It seems odd how the Australians were regularly being sucked into Churchills blunders.

Last edited by Strongbow; May 25th, 2007 at 10:40.
 
June 5th, 2007   Post 46
Del Boy
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
GALLIPOLI

Last edited by Del Boy; June 8th, 2007 at 02:15.
 
June 5th, 2007   Post 47
mmarsh
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by sven hassell
The sinking of The Prince of Wales and The Repulse.Churchill still believed in the supremacy of big battleships over that of aircraft carriers.
It wasn't that Churchill didn't believe in Airpower, the Battle of Britain and the Battle of the Atlantic proved how powerful airplanes were.

Churchill's mistake was the same as the Americans at Pearl Harbor, he severely underestimated the capability of the Japanese Naval Air Corps, in this case the incredible range of the Mitsubishi G4M.
__________________
"My center is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent. I shall attack." -Foch

I get this question a lot. I am from NYC. I fly a French flag because I work for the Paris Office of a International company.

Last edited by mmarsh; June 5th, 2007 at 15:05.
 
June 8th, 2007   Post 48
perseus
Centurion
 
 
I agree that Churchill and the Admiralty still underestimated air power, but it was intended to send the carrier Indomitable, the only such ship available after the Ark Royal had been sunk, but she had run aground in Jamaica.

The other problem was that the rush to send the capital ships to Singapore meant there would not be a large destroyer screen, essential to protect large ships from air attack.

The commander of force Z Phillips was not experienced in the role of aircraft at sea and did not make full use of the fighter aircraft available, as antiquated these were. As soon as fighters appeared in the sky the Japanese aircraft soon cleared off but by then it was too late and the damage was done.
__________________

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. Herman Goering
 
June 8th, 2007   Post 49
MontyB
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Well here is something a little different I think one of his bigger screw ups was ordering a halt to operation Compass and diverting troops from the desert army to the Greek campaign before they captured Tripoli and drove the Italians from the African theatre thus ensuring a foothold for the Afrika Korps and a further 2 years of fighting.
__________________
If horses would have hands and could paint with their hands and create works of art like the humans, then horses would form and paint the gods with the shape of horses and they would build sculptures according to their own bodies.

- Xenophanes
 
June 8th, 2007   Post 50
perseus
Centurion
 
 
Yes, there is no doubt Churchill is to blame for this, the record makes it clear that just as in the case of Norway, Churchill urged this strategic choice in defiance of the military view. Wavell, Cunningham and Longmore stressed the weakness of resources in terms of existing or projected tasks. Churchill also seemed to ignore the latest ultra intelligence on German strength. Churchill chose Greece for political reasons and perhaps his pet idea of a Balkan front .

However what is less widely known is that he later Churchill had second doubts about this and signalled Cairo do not consider yourselves obliged to a Greek enterprise if it is to be another Norwegian fiasco. However Wavell now expressed the opinion that there were a fair chance of stopping the Germans, although the chiefs of staff still disagreed.