| |
| | Post 41 |
| Primus Pilus | say that again http://www.cdi.org/budget/2004/world...y-spending.cfm United States 399.1 Russia* 65.0 China* 47.0 Japan 42.6 United Kingdom 38.4 France 29.5 Germany 24.9 Saudi Arabia 21.3 Italy 19.4 India 15.6 South Korea 14.1 Brazil* 10.7 Taiwan* 10.7 Israel 10.6 Spain 8.4 Australia 7.6 Canada 7.6 Netherlands 6.6 Turkey 5.8 Mexico 5.9 Kuwait* 3.9 Ukraine 5.0 Iran* 4.8 Singapore 4.8 Sweden 4.5 Egypt* 4.4 Norway 3.8 Greece 3.5 Poland 3.5 Argentina* 3.3 United Arab Emirates* 3.1 Colombia* 2.9 Belgium 2.7 Pakistan* 2.6 Denmark 2.4 Vietnam 2.4 North Korea* 2.1 Czech Republic 1.6 Iraq* 1.4 Philippines 1.4 Portugal 1.3 Libya* 1.2 Hungary 1.1 Syria 1.0 Cuba* 0.8 Sudan* 0.6 Yugoslavia 0.7 Luxembourg 0.2 and for Russia its in the year 2001, its much more now.. |
| |
| | Post 42 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | 2004 World Wide Military Expenditures: United States $466.0 billion China $65 billion Russia $50 billion Source: http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...d/spending.htm
__________________ From Corporals to Generals. Rising Dragons of Middle Kingdom. http://s3.invisionfree.com/PLA_MILIT...TURE/index.php |
| |
| | Post 43 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | GDP Ranking 2003 1 World $ 49,000,000,000,000 2 United States $ 10,400,000,000,000 3 China $ 5,700,000,000,000 4 Japan $ 3,550,000,000,000 5 India $ 2,660,000,000,000 6 Germany $ 2,184,000,000,000 7 France $ 1,540,000,000,000 8 United Kingdom $ 1,520,000,000,000 9 Italy $ 1,438,000,000,000 10 Russia $ 1,350,000,000,000 Source: http://www.photius.com/rankings/gdp_2003_0.html |
| |
| | Post 44 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
__________________ | |
| |
| | Post 45 |
| Centurion | "Sweden 4,5 and take half there and put in to maintenance and storehouse for everything that isn´t thrown away or going directly to the rubbish incineration. The growing problem of bureaucracy and the high rate of taxation will be the Swedish armys doom." You don´t need a foregin enemy to kill an army anymore. Cheers: Doc.S ![]()
__________________ Col. Meyers: What\'s your assessment of this situation, Gunny? Highway: It\'s a cluster ****, sir. Marines shouldn\'t be sitting on their sorry asses filling out requisitions for equipment they should already have. Col. Meyers: An astute observation. -Heartbreak Ridge- |
| |
| | Post 46 |
| Milites Gregarius | Countries are spending way to much on military. Why do countries need so many weapons when there just going to be obsolete and thrown out in 10 years... It would be like buying 500 muskets when in 5 years theres going to be the handheld gatling gun... Seems to me there really isnt much of a point. The government should spend more for helping people not killing them . . . |
| |
| | Post 47 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | not that i am ungrateful for the information..but can you guys relate this military spending to the topic of the tanks somehow..or will i have to declare a sort of thing?
__________________ “If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF |
| |
| | Post 48 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
Model KW /Ton Power output KW M1 "Abrams" A1 20.95 1100 A1(HA) 18.97 * A2 17.60 * A2 SEP 17.46 * Leopard 2 A1-A3 19.82 * A4 Pz87 19.82 * Strv121 19.82 * A5 18.43 * Strv122 18.12 * A6 18.87 1170 Speed Farward Model Kph Mph M1 "Abrams" A1 70 43 A1(HA) 67 41 A2 67 41 A2 SEP 65 40 Leopard 2 A1-A3 75 47 A4 Pz87 75 47 Strv121 75 47 A5 70 43 Strv122 70 43 A6 72 45 Sorry didnt take the Russian moddels (takes to long to write all this, i will supply it if asked) Forum screwed it up First colum is KW /TON the second is Power output KW On speed the first colum is Kph and the second colum is Mph | |
| |
| | Post 49 |
| Primus Pilus | Its off topic but i laugh when i see those military expenditures. World $950 billion 2004 est. [see Note 5] Rest-of-World [all but USA] $500 billion 2004 est. [see Note 5] United States $466.0 billion FY04 actual [see Note 8] Im glad to be an American I was wrong about the power output of other tanks the info i was posting was what i learned a long time ago so it was outdated. But the Abrams was making 1500 hp in 1978, other tanks from that era were around half of that. Also that website i posted said somthing at the end about the m1a2 getting a boost in power so it might actually be higher then 1500. I also doubt that their is a tank faster then the abrams because like i said before after 45 mph the tracks fall off. |
| |
| | Post 50 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Jane's Defense Weekly, a respected Britain-based military journal, said the People's Liberation Army is set to deploy a new main battle tank, or MBT, that, when fielded, will become the most powerful of its kind in the world. The Type-98 nonetheless demonstrates that the PLA is capable of producing a world-class MBT. Status: T-98 already in service, T-98Gai(Improved version) in production. PLA are also producing T-99. T-2000 in design. PLA T-98 Main Battle Tank Specifictions: Weight: 51 tons Engine: 1,200hp diesel Power to weight ratio: 23.5hp/ ton SPEED: 60 km/h RANGE: 450km Armor: Frontal arc of turret in RHA: KE Round, 700mm, T-98Gai, 830mm; CE Rnd: 800mm, T-98Gai, 1060mm Armament: MAIN GUN: 125mm smoothbore cannon/missile launcher, 41 rnds; PENETRATION: KE, 800mm; 960mm reported w/ new DU rnd, CE, 680mm est; 9M119 REFLEKS (AT-11 Sniper) gun-launched laser-guided anti-tank missiles, 5km range; 1 x 12.7 mm MG M1A2 Specifications: Weight 69.54 tons Propulsion Gas turbine engine, 1500 horsepower Power-to-weight ratio 21.6 hp/ton Performance Maximum governed speed 42 m.p.h. Speed cross country 30 m.p.h. Range 265 miles cruising Main armament 120 mm smooth bore cannon, M256 Coaxial Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240 Loader's Weapon 7.62 mm machine gun, M240, on Skate mount |
| |