| |
| | Post 31 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | ha ha, well at this point we're just arguing semantics. I just liked the guy who said if you look at the subject of carriers from another angle, the aircraft carriers from all the other countries of the world the U.S. calls Amphibious Assault Ships |
| |
| | Post 32 |
| Immunes | So that means...It's all relative!! |
| |
| | Post 33 | |
| No Chance Outside | Quote:
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED ![]() Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com | |
| |
| | Post 34 |
| Tirones | actually, china has two. one of which is in a lake, built for who knows why. I've been on the one in the lake, and its a proper aircraft carrier, with the landing strip and everything. I live in shanghai, and i have to say, china is odd, annoying, and worst of all, communist. |
| |
| | Post 35 |
| No Chance Outside | A LAKE??? Maybe they felt it was the best place to train a crew on the usage of an aircraft carrier without causing a stir overseas. Then again if you wanted to do that, it would be perfectly possible to just "build" an aircraft carrier into the ground. Meaning You make the ground the deck, and you create everything that the ship would have below deck, underground. Who knows maybe they wanted to practice building an actual one as well. |
| |
| | Post 36 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Yeah, the Kiev is an ex-soviet carrier built in 1975 that the Chinese bought through the South Koreans and now have built into a floating museum. It's actually so popular that another Chinese firm bought the 1978 Soviet carrier the Minsk that is now a in theme park equiped with resturaunts, nightclubs, and even a swimming pool in Beiyang Harbor. Most interestingly is the Ukranian (former USSR) carrier Vayarg which was 70% complete in 1992 when the soviet Union collapsed. The Chinese bought it in 2002 suposedly to be made into a casino. It is currently under heavy guard out of public view at Dalian Shipyards for its 'retrofit' into a casino although due to many very odd circumstances surrounding the ship, most naval annalysts believe its primary function is to be used for Chinese R&D into carriers. |
| |
| | Post 37 |
| No Chance Outside | Those carriers could easily be stripped of those things and used as carriers if need be, but they would only be able to carry obsolete aircraft or top of the line helicopters at best. |
| |
| | Post 38 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
The Chinese looked at retrofitting an old soviet carrier in the 90s but that turned out to be a dead end and found those carriers are only good for R&D for a future domestic carrier. | |
| |
| | Post 39 |
| No Chance Outside | As I mentioned before, this is if you want a full scale carrier. You can simply use it as a flight deck and aircraft maintenance vessel which is assigned to work with a more sophisticated ship. I don't know if they have stripped it of the powerplants... but if they did, the question would be where did they put them? And can they be refitted in working condition? Or can new ones be installed within two months? It must be sea worthy, or else they can't have it floating around as a casino. Basically if it's REALLY required, it can be done. I think the Chinese felt that if they needed a carrier, they'd look for a real one and not these ancient things. |
| |
| | Post 40 |
| Primus Pilus | turning the carriers into a money making scheme is a great idea, just imagine the profits
__________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too. |
| |