China aids Iran's tactical missile programme

About China aids Iran's tactical missile programme Page 2


  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
November 13th, 2004   #11
Chocobo_Blitzer
 
Hey assKICKER, those last two things are CHEAP. There are already topics about those subjects. Stick to the topic at hand plz.

But of course China would sell those things to Iran, China does not care if US soldiers die, same with US selling stuff to Taiwan.


\"The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.\"
 
November 13th, 2004   #12
Asskicker
 
first, call me Asskicker, not ass

then, those things are not Cheap, i say it not because i think china is right to do that,
cuz i want to condemn both U.S and China for doing that

China gives Iran weapons not because we want to kil U.S soldiers, but we want to secure some oil for our ppl

U.S gives weapons to Taiwan because they dont want a united and strong China,,

who is the bad guy here
 
November 13th, 2004   #13
FlyingFrog
 
lol Asskicker,

U can press that "!" button to report "bad words" to Mods, they will take care of that for you

Chocobo, be prepared


From Corporals to Generals. Rising Dragons of Middle Kingdom.
http://s3.invisionfree.com/PLA_MILIT...TURE/index.php
 
November 13th, 2004   #14
Asskicker
 
na..it's alright,
hope he can offer more USEFUL opinion rather than swear words
 
November 13th, 2004   #15
Chocobo_Blitzer
 
There, I made it right.

Anyways, yes those things are cheap, because they bash the US out of context. It's a cheap punch. Anyways....

the bad guy? Iran
 
November 13th, 2004   #16
Asskicker
 
cheap way?
ai ya..i bash U. S because my bashing makes sense

if it doesn't , u offer some reasons,

Iran is not the bad guy in many ppl's eyes (Arabians),
so dont generalize Iran,

U.S is an evil force in many ppl's eyes (i dont think it is )
 
November 13th, 2004   #17
Chocobo_Blitzer
 
It's cheap because it's not apart of the topic, people try to stick to the topic at hand and not divert away. If someone was to challenge those shots, it would change the topic, most people try not to do that. It would be like me randomly mentioning China executes 4,000 people a year. Nothing to do with topic, and changes the subject.

If you want to talk human rights, then go here:

http://www.military-quotes.com/forum...pic.php?t=6252

If you want to talk Iraq war, search this forum, there are many topics...

Iran is persian I know.

Anyways about the real topic, I was wondering, does anyone know how useful this would be for Iran? How harmful to US navy would it be?
 
November 13th, 2004   #18
Asskicker
 
hope u can find more SOLID proves when u talk about China's human rights record,
and make ur own country's human rights record perfect

china has its own problem while U.S has too,
if u always critisize others while u make the same mistakes too, then it is the wrong attitude,
 
November 14th, 2004   #19
Asskicker
 
last post today,since i have to woohoo with my gf

i think china should have a deal with U.S
like CHina won't sell weapos to U.S' s enemy while U.S stops sell weapons to taiwan

that would be cool
 
November 14th, 2004   #20
Chocobo_Blitzer
 
hope you can STAY on topic. Proof? Alright.

http://www.ncadp.org/news_headline_3_15_2004_china.html

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/080100-03.htm

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/storie.../03/15/3081942

http://www.rense.com/general50/chinaexecutes10000.htm

maybe no trust westerns? then have some arab

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...D11779D891.htm

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/displayA...d_March334.xml

and one asian:

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori.../75462/1/.html

However, the number 4,000 that I picked up was from a magizine I read, it talked about the top ten worst dictators of the year, Hu Jintao was #3.