Topic: Can taiwanese kidd DDG can restrain ambition of China?

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology
User Name
Password

 
December 18th, 2005   Post 1
sandy
Primus Pilus
 
Gear


Post; Can taiwanese kidd DDG can restrain ambition of China?


Quote:
TAIWAN NEWS

Taiwan Set For Delivery Of Two US-Built Kidd-Class Destroyers
Taipei (AFP) Dec 06, 2005
The first two of four Kidd-class destroyers sold to Taiwan by the United States are due to arrive at the weekend, bolstering the navy's defense capabilities against rival China, a navy spokesman said Tuesday.
The two destroyers, which were first refitted for Taiwan's use at a US naval shipyard, were scheduled to arrive Saturday at the Suao naval base in the island's northeast, naval lieutenant-commander Wu Chih-chieh told AFP.
A formal commissioning ceremony has been set for mid-December, he said, adding that Taiwan would take delivery of the remaining two destroyers in 2006.
The four Kidd-class destroyers, originally built for the Shah of Iran, were commissioned in the US navy following the Iranian revolution in 1979. They were decommissioned from the US navy in the late 1990s.
Taiwan's navy has said its combat capabilities will be greatly improved thanks to the four 9,600-tonne destroyers, sold to Taiwan as part of an arms package approved by US President George W. Bush in April 2002.
The deal infuriated China, which opposes any arms sales to the island it considers to be part of its territory since the two split in 1949 at the end of a civil war.
In July the Pentagon released a report warning that China had deployed up to 730 ballistic missiles targeting the island.
It said Beijing's defense build-up could tip the military balance against Taiwan and pose a credible threat to other countries in the region.
Analysts say Taiwan's navy badly needs the destroyers, which will be armed with Standard II missiles and a system capable of simultaneously tracking dozens of incoming airborne threats.
The surface-to-air missiles have a range of 144 kilometers (90 miles) and vastly outperform the Standard I missiles deployed on Taiwan's Perry-class frigates. Cross-strait tensions have increased since Chen Shui-bian of the independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party won the presidency in 2000, ending the Kuomintang's 51-year grip on power. He was re-elected last year.
http://www.spacewar.com/news/taiwan-05zn.html
I think kidd class DDG is better than any chinese warship.
Even she is old lady.
 
December 18th, 2005   Post 2
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

I agree with you. I think this is a much stronger naval setup to use the Kid Class Destroyers in an air defence roll and their Kang Ding Class Frigattes in an anti-ship mission profile. The Kang Dings are just horrible at anti-aircraft so these Kidds are an excellent addition to the Taiwanese navy. And at 15% of the origional cost of the Kidd class, the Taiwanese are getting a great deal on them.

Honestly, though, I think the Taiwanese would be best suited by trying to get some better fighter planes. If they could try and get a deal on some F-35s or even F-22s I think that would drastically improve their defence. Because, let's not kid ourselves, whoever wins air superiority is going to win a naval battle in the Taiwan Straight.
 
December 18th, 2005   Post 3
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
I think the Taiwanese would be best suited by trying to get some better fighter planes. If they could try and get a deal on some F-35s or even F-22s
I just dont see why we dont give/sell them a SSBN. Then they have a nuclear deternt, problem solved.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 4
yangyang789
Tirones
 
i just dont see why we dont give them independence,problem solved?
American's problem solved,but china get new problem.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 5
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Eh, we can't get into a China vs. Taiwan thing in a thread like this it'll blow up and take it way off topic.

Let's just stick to the Destroyer in question.

Last edited by Whispering Death; December 19th, 2005 at 01:43.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 6
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


did you know that those KIDD class ships were once built for the Imperial Iranian Navy but never delivered due to the revolution in Iran??

US Navy personnel used to call them Ayatolla class

Laid down by Litton Ingalls, Pascagoula Miss. June 26 1978.
Launched August 11 1979 and commissioned June 27 1981.
Built for Iran.
Taken over by the US Navy By Executive order after the fall of the Shah in July 1979.
Reclassified Guided Missile Destroyer DDG-993 August 8 1979.
Decommissioned March 12 1998 At Norfolk Virginia.
Fate To Taiwan as the DDG-1801 Keelung, scheduled to be commissioned on Dec 19 2005 at Su-Ao Naval Base.

http://www.iinavy.org/sirus.htm

Last edited by phoenix80; December 19th, 2005 at 02:21.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 7
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabs
I just dont see why we dont give/sell them a SSBN. Then they have a nuclear deternt, problem solved.
See: Iran-US relations in the last 50 years for why we don't give foreign nations nuclear secrets.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 8
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


The US should not ever sell first class weaponry like the F-22 or F-35 or a SSBN to the Taiwanese for the simple reason that there is a VERY credible chance of peaceful reunification and then guess who has got their hands on the most advanced weaponry the US produces? Yeah. Backing Taiwan was a cold war gambit and in light of bigger and more dangerous fish I am all in favour of a "catch and release" scheme for this troublesome little island with its gangster elite and complete lack of respect for the rule of law both domestic and international.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 9
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

I wasn't thinking about the F-22/F-35 as being in the same catagory as an SSBN but, yeah, you're right. Even if we where to bomb any next-gen fighters in such a peaceful reunification the Chinese would still get all the pilots and techs that worked with it.

And that's not a good situation.

Better to sell them our out-of-date technology at a discount. This Kidd program is very good for both the US and Taiwan.
 
December 19th, 2005   Post 10
Sea_Cadet
Primus Pilus
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogg
The US should not ever sell first class weaponry like the F-22 or F-35 or a SSBN to the Taiwanese for the simple reason that there is a VERY credible chance of peaceful reunification and then guess who has got their hands on the most advanced weaponry the US produces? Yeah. Backing Taiwan was a cold war gambit and in light of bigger and more dangerous fish I am all in favour of a "catch and release" scheme for this troublesome little island with its gangster elite and complete lack of respect for the rule of law both domestic and international.
No see we don't anybody anything and if Taiwan wants to buy planes from Lockheed Martin let them. And the JSF plans were for European nations to purchase them also.
__________________
Honour.... Courage.... Commitment
US Naval Academy
\"Non sibi sed patriae!\"
(Not for self, but country)
US Navy