California Overturns Gay Marriage

About California Overturns Gay Marriage Page 34


  International Military Forums > The Off-Topic Zone > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
December 13th, 2008   #331
senojekips
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
That's exactly what the article said! The fact that it's not a choice! It's a brain malfunction!
So it's potentially curable?

Quote:
Number 1, arguing for the rights of humans IS right. Regardless of whether you think so or not. Equal treatment of humans is a good thing, in case you haven't noticed from the past.
As we have already seen, it is not a "Right" to live an antisocial lifestyle. It is at best an unreasonable assumption.

Quote:
Number 2, they don't work on EVERYTHING that potentially curable. You're right, they don't use research money on things that are not proven to be curable, because they would rather have gay people living happily than have someone with cancer in constant pain every day. And quite frankly, I don't think the gays would mind it if they found a cure for AIDS before they found a way to reverse homosexuality. When the world is perfectly happy, there are no more diseases, no more sickness AT ALL, then they probably MIGHT research a way to fix all the problems of the brain... Pathological liars don't CHOOSE to be pathological liars, it's a malfunction of the brain. Mentally retarded people don't choose to be mentally retarded, it's a malfunction of the brain.
So we should legislate for the acceptance of pathological liars? I don't think that you or I will ever see it,... like the acceptance of homos. If you care to check, pathological lying is regarded as a "Personality disorder", it is not a disease, and is often as not a choice. For those where the disorder is medically caused, drugs are available.

Did you ever stop to think, why would researchers go to the expense of determining if homos have a brain malfunction, if they were were not then willing to research a cure. It makes the original research a waste of time and money does it not?


"I am totally responsible for what I write,... however I cannot be held responsible for your complete inability to understand"

 
December 14th, 2008   #332
Rob Henderson
 
 
Seno, I'm through with this...
 
December 14th, 2008   #333
The Other Guy
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
So it's potentially curable?

As we have already seen, it is not a "Right" to live an antisocial lifestyle. It is at best an unreasonable assumption.

So we should legislate for the acceptance of pathological liars? I don't think that you or I will ever see it,... like the acceptance of homos. If you care to check, pathological lying is regarded as a "Personality disorder", it is not a disease, and is often as not a choice. For those where the disorder is medically caused, drugs are available.

Did you ever stop to think, why would researchers go to the expense of determining if homos have a brain malfunction, if they were were not then willing to research a cure. It makes the original research a waste of time and money does it not?
So hermits should be forced to live in high density areas? That would be an antisocial lifestyle that is not a right?, is it not?

Can't we just accept it already, f*gs are f*gs, it's not changing, give them human rights, and move on with our pointlesss little lives?


I'm the bleeding heart liberal your mother warned you about.
 
December 14th, 2008   #334
Rob Henderson
 
 
NO, we must B*tch about the inevitable!!!!!!!
 
December 14th, 2008   #335
senojekips
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
NO, we must B*tch about the inevitable!!!!!!!
Well,... you can't blame anyone else for that, that was your choice, you could just have easily accepted the majority ruling like most others have done and argued on the side of reason and common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Other Guy
So hermits should be forced to live in high density areas? That would be an antisocial lifestyle that is not a right?, is it not?
Who ever said that hermits were antisocial?

I think you will find that they are actually "unsocialised" and there is a big difference, they do not actively promote their lack of social skill as a viable alternative nor do they seek legal recognition for their chosen affliction. Tell me next time you see a parade of hermits demanding their "rights".

Your "point" is not even vaguely relevant.

Quote:
Can't we just accept it already, f*gs are f*gs, it's not changing, give them human rights, and move on with our pointless little lives?
That would be a perfect answer fo those who desire to live "pointless lives", however some of us try to improve our lives and that of society in general, we are not willing to let society as we know it slide backwards towards our animal origins, where we are content to merely "scratch the itch" instead of curing the cause.

Homos do have "human rights"*, it's just that their lifestyle doesn't have majority acceptance in a modern world. We all have these problems but most of us eventually learn to accept the social guidelines of a civil society, we don't try to overturn them. As a kid, I hated school and conforming to society's rules but I had to conform in the end, for the betterment of both myself and society. It's the price we all have to pay to keep society moving forward.

*What they don't have, is the "Right" to just do as they wish, against the rules of the majority.

Last edited by senojekips; December 14th, 2008 at 08:04..
 
December 14th, 2008   #336
Rob Henderson
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
Well,... you can't blame anyone else for that, that was your choice, you could just have easily accepted the majority ruling like most others have done and argued on the side of reason and common sense.
So it's reasonable and common sense to deny people the rights to a private matter because of a sexual preference? Really? What kinda reefer do they have down under?

Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
That would be a perfect answer fo those who desire to live "pointless lives", however some of us try to improve our lives and that of society in general, we are not willing to let society as we know it slide backwards towards our animal origins, where we are content to merely "scratch the itch" instead of curing the cause.
/QUOTE]
 
December 14th, 2008   #337
senojekips
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Henderson
So it's reasonable and common sense to deny people the rights to a private matter because of a sexual preference? Really? What kinda reefer do they have down under?

/QUOTE]
It's not only reasonable, it is, as are most of these community expectations, for the advancement of our society, as a whole, not a selfish minority.

The reefers here are mainly Carrier "K" series or "Fridgemoblile" ARC9s with a spattering of older models, why do you ask? Having been in the shipping game for over 25 years I can tell you anything you wish to know about them.
 
December 14th, 2008   #338
Rob Henderson
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
It's not only reasonable, it is, as are most of these community expectations, for the advancement of our society, as a whole, not a selfish minority.
Well good, I'll keep that in mind the next time you want something.
 
December 14th, 2008   #339
senojekips
 
 
You won't find me wanting too much outside of what is normally recognised as being acceptable to society.

Now what was it you were wanting to know about reefers?
 
December 14th, 2008   #340
Rob Henderson
 
 
Nothing...
 



Tags
california, gay rights

Similar Topics
Canada 'can permit gay marriage'
Gay Britons Serve In Military With Little Fuss, As Predicted Discord Does Not Occur
How to tell if it's love, lust or marriage:
5 reasons why men should be gay
Harper's gay marriage strategy exposes rift among Conservat