Topic: Calgary mayor says 'no' to supporting the troops

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > International Military News Discussions
User Name
Password

 
September 12th, 2007   Post 1
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


Post; Calgary mayor says 'no' to supporting the troops


CALGARY/AM770CHQR - A bid to have "support our troops" decals allowed on city vehicles has been shot down again.
Alderman Ric McIver introduced the motion, but Mayor Dave Bronconnier told council it was a matter of reconsidering the issue.
McIver took exception to that and challenged the Mayor's ruling which resulted in a vote.
Council voted down the challenge and the motion was turfed.
It was reported that Mayor Bronconnier called the troop decal issue "the flavour of the month" and brushed aside any further reference to it. Alderman McIver suggested that this ought to be a political issue, as indeed it is.


Permalink
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 2
the_13th_redneck
No Chance Outside
 
 
Gear

He's walking a tight rope. He needs to have the support of his people first, and if that sticker infuriates a lot of people, he's going to lose their trust with them.
Remember P80, he's a politician.
__________________
Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET)
Republic of Korea Marine Corps
TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED

Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 3
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Mayors are generally far more "in touch" with their constituents than their State or Federal counterparts, as they have to live with and deal with them every day. Rate payers are also usually a lot less forgiving of their elected local government officials than they are of other politicians, so they must toe the line far more closely.
__________________
"Too thick to change, and too old to care"
http://www.geocities.com/senojekips/Index.htm
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 4
the_13th_redneck
No Chance Outside
 
 
Gear

He's a servant of the public, the public doesn't work for him.
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 5
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Exactly, therefore he must consider his position very carefully when making decisions such as this. He will obviously try to please the greatest percentage of his constituents and vote accordingly.
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 6
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


He's no leader then, he's a hand puppet with some pollster's digits up his arse controlling him... spineless bastards the lot of them.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
September 12th, 2007   Post 7
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
Exactly, therefore he must consider his position very carefully when making decisions such as this. He will obviously try to please the greatest percentage of his constituents and vote accordingly.
Thats why this type of Politicians are hated by the men of dignity. They change their words and behavior for a few more years in office. Disgraceful...
 
September 13th, 2007   Post 8
the_13th_redneck
No Chance Outside
 
 
Gear

Bulldogg, that's politicians for you. And sometimes he's got to appeal to the masses to get his programs done. Maybe he feels that he doesn't want to get embroiled in arguments over a conflict half a world away that could prevent him from making changes locally. It does make sense to me.
He's the leader of a city, not a country. National matters, he may feel, are beyond his current jurisdiction and his work is hard enough without having to bring up Iraq.
I think we shouldn't jump to conclusions about this one.
I don't necessarily agree with him, but I understand where he's coming from.
 
September 13th, 2007   Post 9
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
Thats why this type of Politicians are hated by the men of dignity. They change their words and behavior for a few more years in office. Disgraceful...
You very conveniently seem to forget that the Mayor is elected by his constituents to do their bidding. If he did not do that, he would be betraying the trust of those who elected him to office. He is in fact just carrying out the will of the majority of his electors.

It's called Democracy.

I don't agree with his decision, but then again I'm not one of his electors, so I don't count.

Last edited by senojekips; September 13th, 2007 at 12:28.
 



Similar Threads
Afghan War Needs Troops
Debate On Troops To Shift To Loyalty
Kiss A Baby Then, Support Our Troops Now
Democratic Leaders Reject Idea Of Draft
India and Pakistan