Bullet stopper

About Bullet stopper Page 2


  International Military Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Forums > General Military Hardware, Gear and Technology Discussions
User Name
Password

 
February 16th, 2004   #11
No MERCY
 
 

DUDE!! info


Dude you need to eatch the discovery channel. It was declassified and the scientist who created it spoke about it. It was very intereasting.
*YOU'll NEVER TAKE ME ALIVE!!!* FAMOUS WAR MOVIES
 
February 16th, 2004   #12
Redneck
 
 
Dude, what was the name of the program? Hearsay doesn't really work as evidence, I would like to see what you saw so I can understand what you're talking about. Even the name of the project or a prototype classification or even a nickname might work, just throw something out there and see if it sticks, ok?


No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen.
 
February 16th, 2004   #13
No MERCY
 
 

No Problamo' info


The name of the show was called wildtech. It the defense episode. The name they had for it was complicated and really long. If not tell me other wise.(THANKs)
 
February 20th, 2004   #14
Chris
 
 
This sounds like the Philidelphia experiment back during WWII.

***SUPPOSEDLY*** a huge field of elecrtomagentism was forced around a light cruiser. All was well until the ship actually disappeared, transported to Norfolk, and then re-appeared in a cloud of green fog.

When the scientists boarded the cruiser, they found the crew deathly ill, some crew was actually "imbedded" in the metal and some were even half way stuck...ie, an arm was inside a bulkhead.

There were multiple reports of mental illness from the crew after this. The experiment was abandoned (imagine that) along with the dream of a "true" stealth ship.

BOOOOGA BOOOOOGA!!!!!


Eternal Father, lend thy grace- to those with wings who fly through space
Through wind and storm, through sun and rain, oh bring them safely home again
O Father hear a humble prayer, for those in peril in the air
 
February 20th, 2004   #15
No MERCY
 
 

HAAAA!!!! info


This experiment is to be used on humans in the near future. The test being run have proven sucessful but they need to try it out in combat situation.

~THE QUICKEST WAY TO LOSE A FIGHT IS NOT TO FIGHT AT ALL!~ SENSEI ANTHONY DIAZ
 
February 20th, 2004   #16
diplomatic_means
 
Chris I never heard of that story can you post a place to find out more about it?
 
February 21st, 2004   #17
No MERCY
 
 

once info


I heard of that once. The ship they have now is being tested and only at night. It is a ship with the power to dive like a sub. It is stealthy fast and leathal. I forgot the name of it though1

~THE QUICKEST WAY TO LOSE A FIGHT IS NOT TO FIGHT AT ALL!~ SENSEI ANTHONY DIAZ
 
March 5th, 2004   #18
Mark Conley
 
 

not quite what he said but info


i remeber a few years back that they were testing a fiber, that once a current passed through it, could obtain a strength equal to kevlar but much lighter. They didnt push foward with the project, because at the time, the current requirements were too high, and kevlar was much more suited for the actual environment.

There is a posting on the Army research and development site about the possibility that the new war fighter uniform could actually blend into its environment, much like the disappearing cammoflauge of the predator movie.let me see if they still have that concept up


“If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF
 
March 5th, 2004   #19
Mark Conley
 
 
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2002/isn.html this link explains the army giving MIT the go ahead to design a uniform based on nanotechnology

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...ground/ofw.htm here another, more informative site on the future of war uniforming

http://www.datafilter.com/mc/c_nyTim...onMar2001.html

this is weird this is the article talking about the new microwave area denial system thats supposed to be humane.


sure

Last edited by DTop; August 3rd, 2006 at 13:19.. Reason: back to back posts are not allowed
 
March 6th, 2004   #20
diplomatic_means
 
The last one was what I mentioned in the SCUTR thread