| |
| | Post 1 |
| Primus Pilus | Post; Bradley LinebackerCapabilities? Is it just an armored anti-aircraft vehicle? Does it still retain the ground mission? Can the rocket launcher be used for ground targets too?
__________________ \"The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.\" |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Centurion | It has it's chain gun and stinger missiles. Pretty basic but gets the job done. The stinger would work on infantry, but it's too expensive for that. Not like the US is facing any real air threat though.
__________________ Ahh...the AK-47, when you absolutely, positively have to kill every last motherf*cker in the room...accept no substitute -Samuel L. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Primus Pilus | That's true, but I was curious if it might be used (the missile) to clear out a fortified poesition. |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Centurion | No, that's what MPAT rounds are for. |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | The Bradley, as a concept, is probably going to prove to be superior to the more traditional tank design because it has a very adaptable platform with lots of options. This is just one example.
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| No Chance Outside | Dunno... there's always issues with the armor. Plus apparently the M-1A2's sensors are much better so it actually makes a better recon vehicle than the Bradleys do.
__________________ Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET) Republic of Korea Marine Corps TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED ![]() Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Mostly, I'm talking about the concept of a more adaptable weapons platform. Bradleys are being used for that, but the Bradley could definitely stand some improving and/or replacing of things. |
| |
| | Post 8 |
| No Chance Outside | You could modify the M-1's turret... but I guess that just costs more. |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | The Bradley's design works better for that. More room to play with, etc. For the M1, you'd prolly want to move the turret back a bit and there's plenty of other things to rework. Better off just sticking with the Bradley. |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| No Chance Outside | With the M-1... all I think is neccessary is that they remove the gun, and stick a rocket launcher on the roof. |
| |