Book IDs Polish priests as informants (AP)

What Error? Is this not what we have been pointlessly circling about for some 20 odd posts. Yes, this is my view and I have supplied endless examples of why that is my belief.

Post5 line 2 refers specifically to, "prior to and during the war", to the exclusion of Post 2 line 1 which occured after the war.

You will have to excuse my brevity, as I am at present also trying to transcribe a 13441 person Family tree, and I still have much to do.
 
Got any German - possibly Masonic - sounding surnames in that there family tree of yours Seno? :)
 
There are a few Masons no doubt, although I have no pictures of old rellies giving secret masonic signs, but the blood lines are 7 parts Northern English (Cumberland, Northumberland and Durham) and one part London Jew, of indeterminate ancestry.

There are plenty of skeletons coming into the light of day.

Now you know why I'm tight with a quid.
 
Last edited:
Heaven forbid:eek:.

Although I must say that I have found more surprising relations, e.g. "The First man hung in Wise County Virginia". Many of his male kin probably should have been on the scaffold with him, but they just kept shooting the posse's. Don't believe me,... try Googling "Talton Hall" and he's only the tip of the iceberg.
 
Seno, looks like I owe you an apology.

The guy below has come forward and says he was helped to escape by Vatican nuns after WWII.

1440122.jpg


The nuns say they are not ashamed and would do it again.

Nuns_with_guns.jpg
 
But of course, "Der Katholische Kirche has vays of making zem talk"

Ach du lieber! zose nuns are our best Sturm Troopers, vot else vould you expect from vimmens!

Heil Humbug!
 
Another reason to NOT rely on Wikipedia... Edinburgh university will toss out your paper if you list Wiki as a source.

Aye, thats probably correct, wiki is not regarded as being peer reviewed. At the University of St Andrews we are strongly advised not to include in scientific papers or informal lab reports etc any web based material which includes wiki
 
Bulldogg and Jequirity, the reference to Wiki that I posted was only one of a possible 4000+ that I offered, which for the most part are in agreement. It just happened to be the one I quoted because it was on top of the heap.

One must always bear in mind that universities produce "experts", and if you put 20 experts in a room and give them a a problem, you will probably get 30 completely different answers, each with a huge explanation of why all of the others are totally wrong :confused:.
 
The biggest thing to remember with Wikipedia, just like every other source of information, is to keep an open mind and always questions it's validity.
Wikipedia is no less reliable than say some news anchor from CBS, a reporter from the New York Times, or a scientist on Greenpeace's payroll, yet somehow those three are all considered reliable sources and Wikipedia is not. Hell at the end of 97% of all wikipedia articles are sources where the author(s) found their information, and most newspapers, magazine articles, journal entries and news reports are political BS anyways. Why is a person with a political agenda more reliable than an internet site that is merely a comprehensive collection of information on almost any subject? My biggest issue with not allowing Wikipedia is a source is that it shouts at the student "You're a [cen] idiot who can't decide on their own if information is credible or not!" It's a slap in the face to tell me that I can not, on my own, decide if a piece of information is credible or not.
 
You're pretty close to the mark Damien. The day that I stop using my own powers of deduction to work out what is correct and what is not will be the day they screw the lid down on my box.

Only two days ago in our State newspaper there was an article by an alleged "expert" stating that taking of vitamin supplements is dangerous to your health. That's a pretty broad brush he's using there.

Several months ago another finding, that Chocolate is not only good for you, it contains anti cancer components. All of these findings flying in the face of previous statements.

Experts change their mind like I change my socks.

Make your own decisions, you'll live longer and be a lot happier, at least you'll have the satisfaction of knowing any mistakes made were not made by any other person than yourself.
 
Last edited:
Don't waste your time trying to upset me with inappropriate comment, because I have a far thicker hide than Monte.

Two points:
1) Its Monty no e.
2) My hide is thick enough to withstand anything that our zealous man of the cloth can throw, however I will not accept national slurs from anyone not even our wannabe pope.

Anyway I let you guys return your amusing little tiff its been an amusing read.
***smirk***
 
Two points:
1) Its Monty no e.
2) My hide is thick enough to withstand anything that our zealous man of the cloth can throw, however I will not accept national slurs from anyone not even our wannabe pope.

DEFEND THE SHEEP!!!
778M.jpg
 
I see nothing other than a bloke having a "shot" at you. He's welcome to have a go at me, as I pointed out my hide is somewhat tougher than that.

It appears that we all have our buttons that can be pushed. I guess it would be wise before we complain about it, to look back and see if we have been pushing the buttons of others somewhere down the track.

I'll be a happy man if the worst that happens to me is to have someone cast aspersions about my character, even moreso if they are correct, I have no shame about who I am. If they are incorrect who cares.

Those who know me know the truth, those who don't, don't care. (nor matter).
 
Last edited:
So would I be correct in paraphrasing you Spike if I said...

";cen: me if I can't take a joke." :)
 
Yeah Bulldogg, as I said, "if people don't want their buttons pushed, they shouldn't go around trying to do it to others".

I guess that would be something to do with how it all started.

I occasionally fall for it myself, but sooner or later we all wake up to who the sh1t stirrers are, and just ignore them.
 
Back
Top