| |
| | Post 1 |
| Optio | Post; Bloody Revolt in a Village Challenges the Rulers of ChinaI for one am shocked at the level of protests, and shocked as well on how quietly it was covered in the West. I had no idea that protests against central rule involved millions of people at a time. Could some of our Chinese posters give insight on this issue? How will the CPC handle this? A Bloody Revolt in a Tiny Village Challenges the Rulers of China Jonathan Watts reports from Huankantou where protesters angry at corruption and poverty repelled 1,000 riot police. But now fear is replacing euphoria Jonathan Watts in Huankantou Friday April 15, 2005 The Guardian Smashed police cars and buses after the battle in Huankantou There is a strange new sightseeing attraction in this normally sleepy corner of the Chinese countryside: smashed police cars, rows of trashed buses and dented riot helmets. They are the trophies of a battle in which peasants scored a rare and bloody victory against the communist authorities, who face one of the most serious popular challenges to their rule in recent years. In driving off more than 1,000 riot police at the start of the week, Huankantou village in Zhejiang province is at the crest of a wave of anarchy that has seen millions of impoverished farmers block roads and launch protests against official corruption, environmental destruction and the growing gap between urban wealth and rural poverty. China's media have been forbidden to report on the government's loss of control, but word is spreading quickly to nearby towns and cities. Tens of thousands of sightseers and wellwishers are flocking every day to see the village that beat the police. But the consequences for Huankantou are far from clear. Having put more than 30 police in hospital, five critically, the 10,000 residents should be bracing for a backlash. Instead, the mood is euphoric. Children have not been to school since Sunday's clash. There are roadblocks outside the chemical factory that was the origin of the dispute. Late at night the streets are full of gawping tourists, marshalled around the battleground by proud locals who bellow chaotic instructions through loudspeakers. "Aren't these villagers brave? They are so tough it's unbelievable," said a taxi driver from Yiwu, the nearest city. "Everybody wants to come and see this place. We really admire them." "We came to take a look because many people have heard of the riot," said a fashionably dressed young woman who had come from Yiwu with friends. "This is really big news." Although the aftermath is evident in a school car park full of smashed police buses, burned out cars and streets full of broken bricks and discarded sticks, the origin of the riot is hazy. Initial reports suggested that it started after the death of two elderly women, who were run over when police attempted to clear their protest against a chemical factory in a nearby industrial park. Witnesses confirmed that the local old people's association had kept a 24-hour vigil for two weeks outside the plant. Many said they had heard of the deaths, but no one could name the victims. The local government of Dongyang insists there were no fatalities. Like many of the other disputes that have racked China in the past year, frustration had been simmering for some time. Locals accused officials of seizing the land for the industrial park - built in 2002 - without their consent. Some blamed toxins from the chemical plant for ruined crops, malformed babies and contamination of the local Huashui river. The village chief reportedly refused to hold a public meeting to hear these grievances. Attempts to petition the central government also proved fruitless. Locals said they had lost faith in the authorities. "The communists are even worse than the Japanese," said one man. Memories are still fresh of the fighting on Sunday. "It was about 4am and I was woken up by an unusual noise," said a Ms Wang, a shopkeeper who lives next to the school where the fiercest fighting took place. "When I looked out of the window, I saw lots of riot police running into the village. Many men rushed out of their houses to defend our village." Accounts of the conflict differ. Residents say 3,000 police stormed the village, several people - including police - were killed, dozens wounded and 30 police buses destroyed. But the Dongyang government says about 1,000 police and local officials were attacked by a mob, which led to 36 injuries and no deaths. The outcome is also unclear. Locals say the village chief has fled. In his place, they have established an organising committee, though its members are a secret. This suggests a fear of recriminations, but the public mood is one of bravado. "We don't feel regret about what we have done," said a middle-aged man. "The police have not come back since they withdrew on Monday. They dare not return." Some, however, admitted to anxiety. Among them was an old woman - also a Mrs Wang - who reluctantly opened her doors to visitors who had come to see her collection of trophies from the battle. "I am scared," she said, as she showed two dented riot police helmets, several empty gas canisters, a policeman's jacket and several truncheons and machetes. "This is getting bigger and bigger." But there have been no arrests and no communication from the authorities. The current leadership will be keen to avoid a Tiananmen Square-style confrontation, including prime minister Wen Jiabao, who pleaded with the Tianan men protesters to leave before the tanks came. At the same time, the authorities are committed to social stability. According to government statistics, protests increased by 15% last year to 58,000, with more than 3 million people taking part. In many provincial capitals, roadblocks occur more than once a week. Last weekend, anti-Japanese demonstrators rallied in three cities, including Beijing. But in Huankantou, villagers do not seem to realise that although they have won the battle, they may be far from winning the war. Amid a crowd of locals beside a wrecked bus, one middle-aged woman won a cheer of approval by calling for the government to make the first move towards reconciliation. "It's up to them to start talking," she said. "I don't know what we would do if the police came back again, but our demand is to make the factory move out of the village. We will not compromise on that." |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Centurion | the problem is the chinese ppl discussing on this board do not live in china, i don't know a single chinese who is actually living in china and discussing on a forum in english. i really want to talk to some chinese who lives in china, for i am certain that he must be having different views than the overseas chinese
__________________ You can either agree with me or be wrong! |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Centurion | Here's some more news from China... 14 April, 2005 Sixty thousand people protest against pollution in China Demonstrators in Huaxi village say they will resist until the government moves chemical plants that are destroying the countryside. Beijing (AsiaNews/Agencies) – About 60,000 people came to the village of Huaxi (Zhejiang province) to protest against high, local levels of pollution. The demonstrators said they would not budge until the government either moved or closed the 13 chemical plants which have polluted the water and ground around the village. Police barred reporters from the scene, but locals reached by telephone said that “yesterday the crowd had reached at least 50,000 or 60,000 people”. For two years, Huaxi residents have petitioned the government to move the factories whose emissions have made agriculture virtually impossible, forcing farmers to seek other forms of employment. The situation precipitated on April 10 when about 3,000 law enforcement officers descended on the village to break up the protest that had started on March 24 when a group of elderly people, mostly women, set up roadblocks on the road leading to the factories. Unconfirmed reports about two people dying in the clashes between demonstrators and police have added fuel to the fire. People began overturning police cars and breaking windows with police officers responding using truncheons and stun guns. Many villagers are outraged at the fact that many local officials are said to own stocks in the 13 chemical plants. Local, state-controlled press have instead said that officials are very concerned by environmental issues and have compensated farmers who suffered losses from contaminated emissions. A local paper reported that the police decided to break up the protests on Sunday because they were worried that “the coming of cold air and a dramatic temperature drop threatened the health of feeble old women.” Pollution in China is much more than an environmental issue; it is increasingly becoming a social problem as well. The riot in Huaxi is more a symptom of a widening social unrest that is spreading throughout the Chinese countryside. Niu Wenyuan, director of the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Policy and Management, warned that the country is facing more environmental pressures as rural areas became more urbanised. (MA) http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=3036 |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
The problem is how are you going to find the average Chinese actualy living in China who is not a member of the Communist party with internet access. Most of them probably can't afford it, the average yearly income is only about $900. Even if they can, or get public access to it, it could be monitored. | |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Primus Pilus | I wonder how in a communist system, the rural people still get the lower rung of the ladder compared to the city folk. Wasn't that supposed to have died out? Or at least imporved. |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
__________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too. | |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Centurion | Post; HehehI lived in China for 17 years. Do I count? Rural folks get the stiff when Capitalistic system being implemented without having a plan taing care of farming communities. It has been like that since the very first government being installed. Currently, China doesn't have a established farming system that help the farmers stay afloat like the US. it is nice to hear stuff from the locals. However, I find that many westerners and politicians use what these locals wants and desires to degrade China (ignoring its desire to move forward) generate anti-China, and possible stage movements that overthrow the government. Instead of helping Chinese from economic and educational side, westerners tend to rattle that country's foundation in the name of freedom and liberty, yet ignore the eventual hardship Chinese will be facing. |
| |
| | Post 8 | ||
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Hi, What about Religious freedom..........what's the Situation about it there....... going By past experience Communism has always looked upon Religion as a threat to itself. ? ............. Does the Chinset Communist Rulers too Look towards the religion as their predesecors did? Quote:
Quote:
__________________ ![]() | Chestnut Hill Apartments | Indian Revolutioners | San Diego Dog Training | San Diego Website Design | | ||
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Centurion | Post; Quickie on that...If you dig through history of China, religion have been part of ruling class in China. All emperors exploited religion to sustain and re-enforecd its mandate of heaven to rule over Chinese. Religion is fine by itself, yet many practitioners tend to direct the power of religion towards self-interests both political and economic; western religions have seen many of these. Politics in conjunction of Religion ruled China over 5000 years. Would you agree that religion is a bit misused here? Many locals turn religion into superstition. By using religion and superstition, much fear and order were instilled in general publics. Throughout Chinese history, government officials, religious entities and superstition practitioners would persecute anyone using laws that injected with their own rules, values, and morals. People became pessimistic towards their own destinies and value; People value religion and superstition more compare to scientific results. The Boxer rebellion paint a clearer picture of religion abuse by the a few. Many accounts of westerners use religion to smuggle women and treasures: silver, gold, and artifacts out of China for profits during the Qing dynasty. Old values mingled with religion and suspstitions had prevent China reach out and realize its fallen behind in economic, scientific, cultural, militaristic, and social progression. Chinese communists saw and understood the decay of China's status caused by theory of Mandate of Heaven, abuse of religion, rigidities in social environment, and especially the unscientific, ridiculous religion-based superstition. Therefore, they elected to root out anything associated with religion and things that prohibit self-actualization. However, Communist fail to realize and practice the requirement of fulfilling basic needs in order to achieve self-actualization. And that is where it failed during 50s, 60s, and the 70s in China. Part of my understanding of religion restriction in China, besides centralization of political control, is that Chinese people are easily swayed away from science and reality by religion for its deeply dependence on second factors instead of people's own ability to rule, for example (rough one), regular Chinese alawys believe that one's life is premade/predesigned by Budha or karma instead of abilities self-govern and self-improve. Now, I do believe in freedom of religion. However, I don't like to see Mujihadeens like extremists running around in the name of Mandate of Heaven crap. PS. Made a mistake: Suspitition means Superstition |
| |
| | Post 10 | ||
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase | ||
| |