WarMachine
Active member
If it was followed by the centurion then it sounds british to me. It's familiar to the challenger model in name i think, the centurion that is.
I'll agree with that.2dold4this said:
Just to say that there really wasn't anything wrong with the reliability of the Tiger I. It wasn't as reliable as the Panzer Mk IV but it was decently reliable nonetheless. Perhaps you're thinking of the Tiger II?Ted said:Easy: Panther tank! A nice combination of punching power, speed, good engineering and reliablilty (especially compared to the Tigers). I certainly wouldn't want to go up against one, while sitting in a Sherman.
2dold4this said:I think some of the problems with late war German designs can be attributed to poor metallurgy. The Germans lacked the needed alloys to make good steel at the end of the war.
Stunning revelation.zander_0633 said:Well, many of their factories were destroyed too.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.