Belgian Infanty Unit / Landcomponent

About Belgian Infanty Unit / Landcomponent Page 2


  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Videos and Pictures Forum
User Name
Password

 
October 5th, 2011   #11
Yossarian
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PzBrig15
lol..... I hope they had more.....
Betweeen , in Europe the Gouverments are reduced their Military equipment . In these Forums I didn `t found Persons ´they find it good.
The Nederland lost there 60 Leopard 2 A6 NL-Version at 01.May 2011.
So the Nederland and belgium did not have Main battle Tanks. I mean
that are a big Mistake.......

Maybe it seems like Russia needs to step up it's game and threaten the whole of Western Europe again to nessesitate further development of the Leopard. lol

Great photos by the way.



"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience"- Dwight D. Eisenhower , Jan 17,1961.
 
October 9th, 2011   #12
PzBrig15
 
 
and more Pictures by the Exercises Battle Axe 2011 .
Dingo 2



High-Res Pictures at the follow LINK
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig1...n/photostream/
 
February 21st, 2012   #13
PzBrig15
 
 

Belgium APC / MOWAG Piranha IIIC info


MOWAG Piranha IIIC / Belgium Army / Pictures by the Exercises " Battle Axe 2011 "

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig1...in/photostream
 
May 17th, 2012   #14
PzBrig15
 
 
CERTEX 2012 :

Belgium Vehicles and Soldiers by thze Exercises CERTEX 2012 .







All Pictures at High-Res Version at the follow Website / LINK :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig1...7629767706814/
 
June 30th, 2012   #15
PzBrig15
 
 
The new Dirtectly Fire Vehicle ( DF90 ) of the Belgium Army .
MOWAG Piranha IIIC DF90

High-res Pictures.......http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig1...7630269931188/









High-Res Versions of these Pictures by the follow LINK:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig1...7630269931188/
 
June 30th, 2012   #16
MontyB
 
 
Nice photos but man that has to be the ugliest vehicle on the market, I take it they couldn't build it any taller without it falling over?



We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld
 
July 1st, 2012   #17
PzBrig15
 
 
and more Pictures of the Landcopmonent Day 2012 :



and pictures of the Leopard 1 A5 BE . They reduce their Fleet in the next month .These Pictures are one of the last.......





and all Pictures at High-res by the follow LINK :
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pzbrig15/
 
July 2nd, 2012   #18
VDKMS
 
The DF90 was a bad buy. The 90mm gun is non NATO standard. This vehicle's price tag is almost 4 million €. The vehicles are not used (only training) and needs to be sold but up until now isn't.
 
July 2nd, 2012   #19
MontyB
 
 
How stable under firing conditions are they, it looks to tall to be a stable fighting platform for a gun of that size.
 
July 4th, 2012   #20
VDKMS
 
The 90mm gun was a Belgian political decision. It was a surplus from Cockerill. The Belgians (will) have 18 of them and are not used. They have tried the same gun earlier on a Scimitar but that resulted in cracks in the aluminum chassis after several firings. The DF90 was intended as a replacement for the Leopard tanks. It urned out to be a waste of money (4 mill € a piece). The operators also complain about the lack of a coaxial .50 machine gun.
 



Similar Topics
US unit masters art of counterinsurgency
Military Unit Research
U.S. Army MASH Unit Rolls Into Pakistan
0311 Marine Reservist at a Non-Infantry Unit?
How do you expect to improve your unit in 2005?