Topic: battle of lexington and concord

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > Older and Ancient Military History
User Name
Password

 
May 12th, 2005   Post 1
danthepirate
Optio
 

Post; battle of lexington and concord


who fired the first shot at the battle of lexington and concord? the americans or the british? and why we may ask. The british were advancing to concord but the american minute men were in their way. Does this mean that the british fired the first shot? Or could the americans, with the taste of blood, ignored major pitcairn and fired on the brits any way? we may never know. what are you opinions?

__________________
Flight, mans greatest accomplishment since sliced bread...
\"Forget the torpedoes, Full speed ahead!\"
Admiral David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870). Aboard Hartford
\"The battle of Iwo Jima has been won. Among the Americans who served on Iwo, uncommon valor was a common virtue.\"Nimitz
http://s14.invisionfree.com/3rd_Army/index.php?act=idx
 
May 12th, 2005   Post 2
rotc boy
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Vin diesel fired the first shot at the battle of lexington and concord

now time to get serious....
it was probably the Americans because they had less men so one of their guys got scared and shot....
just my 2 cents
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moving0target
Can't tell you how many times I've heard thugs robbing convenience stores say to each other, "Fix bayonets!"
 
May 12th, 2005   Post 3
WarMachine
Primus Pilus
 
 
Neither, some bystander with a gun got clumsy and shot it off. How hard is this to believe? The americans weren't about to shoot and start a battle because they weren't ready to die, and the british were too disciplined to shoot guns off in the middle of talking.
 
May 12th, 2005   Post 4
danthepirate
Optio
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarMachine
Neither, some bystander with a gun got clumsy and shot it off. How hard is this to believe? The americans weren't about to shoot and start a battle because they weren't ready to die, and the british were too disciplined to shoot guns off in the middle of talking.
yeah your probably right, but it is a very interesting thought
 
May 12th, 2005   Post 5
behemoth79
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Vin Diesel.... damn i love that site. hes the answer to everything. I think it was the American side because the brits were too well trained to fire without being ordered to.
__________________


si deum nobiscum, quis contra?
AS LONG AS DIXIE STILL EXISTS,THIS COUNTRY WILL NEVER FALL
 
May 12th, 2005   Post 6
Desert_Eagle
Optio
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by behemoth79
Vin Diesel.... damn i love that site. hes the answer to everything. I think it was the American side because the brits were too well trained to fire without being ordered to.
True, true. He was also probably a sniper.
__________________
A \'good\' landing is one from which you can walk away. A \'great\' landing is one after which they can use the plane again.
 
May 13th, 2005   Post 7
grizzly
Milites Gregarius
 
I think that i was someone in the houses. A Patriot who wanted to kill the brits
My thought anyway
 
May 13th, 2005   Post 8
Desert_Eagle
Optio
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by grizzly
I think that i was someone in the houses. A Patriot who wanted to kill the brits
My thought anyway
probably
 
May 14th, 2005   Post 9
Molly Pitcher
Optio
 
Or maybe it was just somebody who's fireplace got out of hand and yelled "Fire!" at a really, really bad time. :P
__________________
A M O R ~ V I N C I T ~ O M N I A
\"Love Conquers Everything\" - Horace

http://earlyamerica.com/molly_pitcher.html
 
May 14th, 2005   Post 10
MontyB
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 

Post; Re: battle of lexington and concord


Quote:
Originally Posted by danthepirate
who fired the first shot at the battle of lexington and concord? the americans or the british? and why we may ask. The british were advancing to concord but the american minute men were in their way. Does this mean that the british fired the first shot? Or could the americans, with the taste of blood, ignored major pitcairn and fired on the brits any way? we may never know. what are you opinions?

I think I can help narrow the options down a little here, I can categorically say it wasn't me.
__________________
If horses would have hands and could paint with their hands and create works of art like the humans, then horses would form and paint the gods with the shape of horses and they would build sculptures according to their own bodies.

- Xenophanes