Topic: Atomic bomb. 3

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > World War 1 to World War 2 Forum
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :do u think that the use of the atomic bomb in ww2 was needed?
Yep. (why?) 25 89.29%
Not really no. (why?) 3 10.71%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

 
April 4th, 2006   Post 21
Navy Boy
I LOVE THE ARMY!!!!!!
 
 
Gear

I voted yes because we would be over wellmed by the japs. and woudn't have the freedom that we have today in the U.S.A.
__________________
This is Vice Admiral J. Kevin Moran

Semper Fortis
 
April 4th, 2006   Post 22
JulesLee
Primus Pilus
 
 
Gear

well the japanese fought for the emperor and they would kill themselves for the emperor.. man so japs are crazy lol! i guess their loyalty was real high.. cuz they believe that their emperor is a decendent from the Sun God or something.. dont quote me on this! haha!
I think the reason US dropped the bomb was that it wasted BILLIONS of dollars for the Manhatten Project and after they tested the Trinity Bomb; they wanted to test it a little more and see the "real" effect of the bomb to humans. With that they found out that one type is stronger than the other? yeah.. I think its money issues also; all that money for nothing and used that to show the power of US?... also for revenge of all the soldiers that has fallen in battle/POW with the japanese and the sailors that died on pearl harbor I guess.
__________________
NMMI = Prison (but you pay $ for it)
 
April 5th, 2006   Post 23
LeEnfield
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

JulesLee....Do you honestly think that was the only reason that the bomb was dropped. Even after the first bomb had been dropped there was still no reply about surrendering. When the second bomb dropped it was the Emperor that stated the war had to end. Even after that there was a group of Army Officer that planned to size the Emperor so that the war could continue. The whole population was being taught to fight the invaders to the death, so a million allied Casualties was a strong possibility, and that is not counting the Japanese that would have died during the invasion.
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
April 5th, 2006   Post 24
MightyMacbeth
ICBM
 
 
Gear

yep^ Major kenji hatanaka and a group planned and nearly succeded in preventing the surrender
__________________
~when a man does his best, what else is there? Gen.George S.Patton

 
April 6th, 2006   Post 25
chronoserpent
Optio
 
 
Gear

Before I start, let me say I voted yes.

But in reality, it's too hard to tell. We've had all sorts of discussion and debate on this topic in school, and the only conclusion I've come to is that you can't make one. Major events in history like this are just too hard to make a "what if?" situation for. You can't just isolate one little thing like this and expect everything else to be the same. There are too many variables. So in other words, I really dislike playing with "what if?" scenarios unless it's just for fun.

So then, here are the points:

Against: Japan was rotting on the vine. Several months of American blockade and incessant bombing were taking their toll. At first, it was "just" B-29's making firebombing raids every few nights. But by the end of the war, Japan's military had been so thoroughly devastated that American aircraft carriers could safely come close enough for carrier aircraft to attack the Japanese mainland. Japanese war industries had ground to a hault. There was almost no fuel and no raw materials left, not to mention almost no trained & experienced pilots, soldiers, and sailors, and not much population left to draw on. There is now strong evidence that the emperor and several of his closest advisors were preparing to surrender, no matter what the war crazed military would say. If I am correct, the emperor actually had already recorded a mesasge to announce their surrender when the first bomb was dropped. Furthermore, just a few days before the bomb was dropped, the USSR entered the pacific campaign and began to vigorously fight south into Manchuria, and probably wouldn't have hesitated to go straight to Japan.

In short, those against the bomb say that Japan was already on her knees, and if she had been given a better chance to surrender (instead of "unconditional", allow them to keep their Emperor), she would have.


For: Although Japan was militarily on her knees and by all means had already lost (except they didn't admit it), they still had an incredible fighting spirit. Japanese military leaders called for all men, women, and children to meet the American "devils" on the beaches with any weapon they could find and fight to their "honorable" deaths. A few weeks ago, my history teacher showed us a Japanese propaganda film showing a Japanese military rally, where people cheered vigorously as they sent off 13-14 year old boys to fight. The main speaker gave a speech about fighting to the death and making the ultimate sacrifice for their Emperor. A chilling sight, indeed.

Also, Russian entry into the war would only serve to cause further conflict, not a solution. It is because of the Russian entry that Korea was "tempoarily" divided into Communist north and Democratic south, and to a lesser extent that Mao eventually defeated Chiang Kai Shek (sp?) in China. If Russia were to have assisted the US in an invasion of Japan, it is doubless that today we would have the same, a north and south Japan. This kind of seperation has caused nothing but suffering for countries that have endured it (Germany, Korea, Viet Nam).

So, in short: The bomb was necessary to quickly end the war, saving millions of American and Japanese lives, as well as preventing a split of Japan and halting postwar Communist influence.


As I said before, you really can't tell though. What if Japan's citizens disobeyed their call to suicide and demanded the Emperor to surrender? What if the military coup that almost brought down the emperor when he tried to surrender had succeeded? What if the bomb failed to go off or did not have the great effect we had hoped for?


Man, I'm such a nerd. THIS is what AP history classes do to you!
__________________
Midshipman Third Class
Trojan Battalion NROTC

Last edited by chronoserpent; April 6th, 2006 at 02:01.
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 26
Fox
Can you hear me now?
 
 
Gear

Wow....yes, you are a true nerd. LOL! BTW, good think there, chronoserpent
__________________
Why should I have to "Press 1 for English?"
--Every American

 
April 6th, 2006   Post 27
FULLMETALJACKET
MilForum Bad Apple
 
 
Gear

Yes.
We needed the Atomic bomb as a massive blow to Japan.
As someone already mentioned they will fight and die, in old Japan when they were trying to escape their so called "potted plant." existence they actually trained the soldier that he should die in combat, that to come home was not the way of honor. ive heard many a say;"The downfall of the Americans is that they care to much, they have a heart and are not ruthless, this will be their downfall." I dont think so, that just makes us that much better. only a fool would send his whole squad into their deaths vs. a .50 cal on a hill. With out the Atomic Bomb we would still be fighting.
N.McAlister
__________________
"For Democracy, any man would give his only begotten son."
 
April 6th, 2006   Post 28
MightyMacbeth
ICBM
 
 
Gear

hmm, fascinating points indeed..

especially chronoserpent heh..

good good
 
April 7th, 2006   Post 29
LeEnfield
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Germany had been in the same position but did you see them run up the white flag, no they fought until Germany had been over run, and it would have been the same in Japan. Also no one has mentioned the POW's as Japan had planned to kill them all just before they lost war. I worked with a chap who had been just marched out of Nagasaki on his way to a death camp when the A Bomb was dropped on the place. Needless to say he could praise America enough for dropping the dam thing.
 
April 7th, 2006   Post 30
FULLMETALJACKET
MilForum Bad Apple
 
 
Gear

heartless.
I never even thought about that LeEnfeild.