What Rabs said.

Originally Posted by EagleHammer

The Country's that don't have Nuklear Weapons could pressure Iran to Stop, not the Country's that have them, they are Hypocritical(I think that's the right word.).

What you are totally missing is that the U.S. has used WMD in the past and realize what the consequences of that action is.

For What It's Worth: Iran would not have the same restrictions on using the bomb is they decided that it was something they wanted to do. The U.S., due to the repurcussions from using the bomb in WWII are reluctant to use any Nuclear Weapons as a first strike. We will only use them in response and that is questionable for the present.

If we did not have WMD's Iran would have started lobbing them out with impunity. Think about it, this is not a U.S. vs. Iran situation, it is Iran vs. the World. If the U.S. has WMD it is a deterant(sp) to those that might use them.

Originally Posted by Senior Chief

What you are totally missing is that the U.S. has used WMD in the past and realize what the consequences of that action is.

For What It's Worth: Iran would not have the same restrictions on using the bomb is they decided that it was something they wanted to do. The U.S., due to the repurcussions from using the bomb in WWII are reluctant to use any Nuclear Weapons as a first strike. We will only use them in response and that is questionable for the present.

If we did not have WMD's Iran would have started lobbing them out with impunity. Think about it, this is not a U.S. vs. Iran situation, it is Iran vs. the World. If the U.S. has WMD it is a deterant(sp) to those that might use them.

First of all, i think the Nuklear Weapons in World War two, was the right thing to do it probably saved alot of lives.

Second of all, i do not think U.S would use them as first strike weapons either, but im afraid that if Iran would be attack be cause they said the hade made a nuklear bomb, and then blow one in a city or a Smaller similear bomb some were else, i think the U.S would get so pissed they wouldn't care about any one in the country.

No matter how you look at it, allowing Iran to procure or manufacture Nuclear WMD would be a sure sign of complacency and idiocy on the part of the world.

You can not think with the same rationale, upbringing and morals that you use day to day. You have to put yourself in the other person's shoes. There is no way in hell that if a fanatic has/had the chance to use a WMD with impunity that he would pass up the chance.

But we are talking about an essentially extremist type of society. This is not to say that all are extremists of course. If the leaders of the country thought it was in their countrymen's best interest both politically and religiously to do this then do you really think they would hesitate?

I personally do not think they would hesitate any longer than it took to build it and set it off.

Originally Posted by EagleHammer

I don't whant Iran to have Weapons Of Mass Destruction,

Having said that i think The Unites States should mind their own F******
Busines, What makes them think the can control Iran, When they them self has Nuclear Weapons.? I know they aren't the only one protesting it but i think they have the biggest problem with it. .

You mean you are okay with a country that

1. supports Hezbollah
2. threatens to wipe Israel off the map
3. hangs women because they were raped
4. supports Iraqi insurgent groups
5. demands the US pay for the Danish islamic cartoons

having nukes...??

No i am not, but i am on the Nuclear issue, When they haven't shown the would be worse with Nukes Then any one else.

It's only Spekulation that they would be.

Don't get me wrong i would not like to see them having them.

That about threatens to wipe Israel of the Map,

They only talk about a Attack like U.S and Israel has if the don't Stop with their Nuclear issue, Just more volguar(Not sure on how to spell it.).

They only talk about a Attack like U.S and Israel has if the don't Stop with their Nuclear issue, Just more volguar(Not sure on how to spell it.).

Theres a little bit of a diffrene between genocide, and keeping people that want to commit genocide from being able to do it.

Originally Posted by Easy-8

You mean you are okay with a country that

1. supports Hezbollah
2. threatens to wipe Israel off the map
3. hangs women because they were raped
4. supports Iraqi insurgent groups
5. demands the US pay for the Danish islamic cartoons

having nukes...??

I simulated Iran,s believable excuse for doing.
and answer them

1.Hezbollah is supported by many civilians in the world.
Hezbollah is Freedom Fighter and we are just supporting their humanitarian issues
2.No,Iran don,t hope it.
Israel have nuclear weapons and make killing palestinians.

3.This is false to spoil iran's name.
This is zionist's entrigue.

4.We are supporting "FREEDOM FIGHTERS" as US did in afganistan.

5.Danish cartoons did despite to muhamad.
By the way,holocaust denial in europe was arrested.
What is Free Speech?

about Holocaust_denial

Originally Posted by Easy-8

3. hangs women because they were raped

hmm... punishing someone for being raped....
there was this thing in pakistan about rape being used as punishment.

In some small village in Pakistan, there was an uproar about a guy having 'illicit relations' with a woman who was, i think, socially his superior.
As a punishment, his sister was sentenced by the village council to be gang-raped by around 5 people.

7 people were eventually tried in regard to this, they were aquitted.

Hmmmmm,
Anyway,we should hope reconstructive iranian president in 2009.
I have a sharp pain in my stomach at the very thought.
Between now and then,we have to negotiate with him:The child of revolution.