| |
| | Post 1 |
| Primus Pilus | Post; Allied war crimes during WW II ?I always like to read and interpret history from a critical point of view. I never think that things are black or white, I prefer to see the scale btw those colours. When we talk about war crimes always appears jew genocide (wich was horrible), but during WW II also happened things that should have been judged in a war crime court. I will give a few examples: - On the night of February 13th 1945 Dresden was bombed with 730.000 incendiaries bombs. The estimates range from 30.000 to 150.000 people killed, the real numbers of how many were actually killed will never be known because Dresden had a large number of refugees in the city at the time of the bombing. - When Germany surrendered in May 1945, the American Military Governor, General Eisenhower, sent out an “urgent courier” with instructions making it a crime punishable by death to feed German prisoners. It was even a capital offence to gather food together in one place to take to prisoners. The message reads in part: “…Under no circumstances may food supplies be assembled among the local inhabitants in order to deliver them to prisoners of war. Those who violate this command and nevertheless try to circumvent this blockade to allow something to come to the prisoners place themselves in danger of being shot…” Between 1941 and 1950 around one and a half to two million German prisoners of war died. Whilst a further five million seven hundred thousand German civilians died between 1946 and 1950, largely, Bacque maintains, as a result of Allied policy. In all Bacque’s estimates that between nine and half and fourteen million ethnic Germans, German prisoners of war and civilians were to die in these iniquities. Part of the blame for this can be laid at the feet of Josef Stalin who, through his propaganda minister, Ilya Ehrenburg, actually encouraged the rape and degradation of the German civilian population. - Hiroshima & Nagasaki. By the end of 1945, some 145,000 people had died in Hiroshima, and some 75,000 people had died in Nagasaki. Tens of thousands more suffered serious injuries. Deaths among survivors of the bombings have continued over the years due primarily to the effects of radiation poisoning.
__________________ ![]() “The waves of the ocean arrives before to this mountain than the romans´ arms” Corocotta, Cantabrian warrior (century I B.C) |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | The Allies were certainly guilty of numerous war crimes, particularly the Soviet Union. But the winners tend to enjoy the luxury of being able, to a certain degree, gloss over any crimes they may have committed. Nothing the Western Allies did though can come even close to comparing to what Hitler did to the Jews and the Slavs or even what Stalin did to his own people.
__________________ "An Emperor is subject to no-one but God and justice." Frederick 1, Barbarossa |
| |
| | Post 3 | |
| Primus Pilus | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 4 |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | All I can say is War Is Hell.
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill |
| |
| | Post 5 | |
| Optio | Post; Re: Allied war crimes during WW II ?Dear Member, 1> The statement about starving German prisoners has been proven a hoax over and over -- ie it is in the same catagory as the photos of the dead in the concentration camps were bombing victims and 6 milllion Jews were not killed by Hitlers thugs. 2> Both Dresden and Hiroshima were not declared "open cities" and were actually defended citied and both the Germans and Japanese had engaged in terror bombing first (ie including the bombing of cities declared open) and before the 1949 Geneva Convention there was what was called "reciprocity" meaning if one side ignored international law and broke it then the other side could retaliate in kind. Finally, I have heard that more and more messages like this are poping up in Europe and in books and speeches (ie sort of like many in the US over fustration over Iraq bashing the French all the time and even claiming that France never helped the US much even including at Yorktown in 1782). It is a lot like I think after the American Civil War ended. Many whites in the South had come at first to an acceptance of that enslaving the Blacks was wrong. But after a few decades and the shock had worn off they changed their atttitude to the "Old South Lost Cause" where the Black slaves were actually very happy, well treated and loved their masters and that the evil Northeners mistreated their Irish and other immigrants far worst, etc. And then they started the legend about the brutal occupation of the South by the Union after the war ended -- ie when in fact as civil wars go the peace after was totally the opposite with only one Confederate POW camp commander being shot and even the President of the Confederacy who was a former Army officer and Secretary of War and legally was guilty of treason was only held less than a year. But in their minds there was mass rape, murder, and pillage by the occupation forces. Only today are they admitting it was not true. Jack E. Hammond NOTE> To give credit, the Japanese are far worst than any of the revisionists in Europe about WW2. They have convinced themselves they waged a war of liberation of the Asians from the Europeans and not a brutal (and it was extremely brutal by any measure) of conquest where they held the Asians they conquerored in more contempt than the Europeans. This kind of revisition of actual history is now causing a massive problem betwen China and Japan. Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Optio | Quote:
Better to say "It is not true." Even General Sherman who made that statement kept his soldiers in line (ie he did not allow rape and murder or mistreatment of prisoners and the pillage was only along the line of march from Atlanta to Savannah and he made orders that food be left behind enough to make it). You will read a lot of this stuff from those that do not like their past. It is a self protection mechanism I believe maybe. Or it is trying to gain and advantage -- ie many pro-Israeli groups push the belief that the Allies could have stopped the butchering of the Jews but just ignored it. Jack E. Hammond PS> Of all the wrongs that the US did after WW2 I can only think of one that was truely horrible. And that was the execution of General Yamashita in 1946. But compared to past behavior of occupiers in wars the US and the UK have a reputation none can touch. US Admirals (including both King and Nimitz) came to the defense of the German Admiral over U-boat warfare who the Allies wanted to execute. | |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | If War crimes were not done then war would be a very boring thing.
__________________ ^_^ |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Primus Pilus | Jack, you should not compare Dresden and Hiroshima-Nagasaki with for example The bombing of London. Dresden was completely destroyed in a single night, not to mention Hiroshima...Cocerning the dead of thousand of german citizens: Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 9 | ||
| Optio | Dear Member, I could argue all the below till the cows come home as the say in the US. A US colonel helped on a book with the same stuff you have shown below. It became very controversial in the US and even Europe. But it only was a short time before the historical researchers and experts started to take apart everything thing you have posted below. Don't get me wrong. You believe everything you have posted (ie just as the PM of Israel actually believe that in 1943 and 1944 that the Allies could have stopped the massacre of the Jews if only they had wanted to). But the fact is it is not true. And as one famous Victorian general stated "Yes it all could be true for the sake of a debate -- as long as all the facts are not deployed." This was debated over on Compuserves Military Forum when it was the big dog on the block in the 1990s. One gentleman came and brought the same facts and quotes and dates you have. Only he did not know there was an expert historical researcher on the forum at that time. CS Military Forum is nothing but a shell now (ie mainly for right wing Christians) and a lot of the forums and libraries were deleted. But I wish that one file of saved debates in certain year in around 1995-95 was available. It has everything you have listed and the relative facts. Finally, I am sorry, but I think I will bow out of this debate. In a way it is like debating the neo-Confederates in my country or the Holocaust didn't happen crowd in the world. It gets tiresome going over and over and over and over. Jack E. Hammond Jack E. Hammond Quote:
| ||
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Immunes | War crimes are terrible in nature, and I know it's hardly an excuse, but what the Soviet soldiers have done in Germany or to the German prisoners, to that I can only say; eye for an eye. What was done to my native country, Ukraine, or Russia, Belorussia, etc, (most of USSR basically) by the Third Reich is an indescribable horror. If I, by some sick twist of fate, would find myself in a similar situation, knowing that my motherland has been raped, pillaged, millions murdered, starved and mutilated and that my family is quite likely has been killed by the Germans, it would be an understatement saying that I'd be pretty angry, and I would not take any prisoners. And, well, winners are rarely judged. If the Nazis had won, their war crimes and genocide would probably be feats of heroism in history books today. A beaten cliche phrase, yet very true, history is written by the winners. There were a lot of rapes when Russians took Berlin, and a lot of treasures were stolen, etc, and yet the Berlin campaign is regarded as a highly successful battle, etc. Most of allied soldiers took 'souvenirs' home. Not all war crimes were commited by the Germans or Soviets, there were a lot of other allied crimes in fact, on every side. It's never black and white. |
| |