Topic: Air Force B-52 carries armed Nucs by mistake ...

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
September 6th, 2007   Post 1
Chief Bones
Forums Grumpy Old Man
 
 
Gear


Post; Air Force B-52 carries armed Nucs by mistake ...


B-52 carried nuclear armed cruise missiles by mistake: US

Excerpt:

WASHINGTON (AFP) — A B-52 bomber flew the length of the United States last week loaded with six nuclear-armed cruise missiles in a major security breach, US military officials said Wednesday.

The lapse was reported to President George W. Bush after the nuclear warheads were discovered when the aircraft landed at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, a military official said on condition of anonymity.

Read the rest of the article at the url below.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5...5v9Xi6M5zdr9IA

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As the United States carries on a discussion as to how much Homeland Security is too much, the Air Force seems to have forgotten basic Nuclear Weapons Security ... they carried out a FUBAR operation when they transported live Nuclear Weapons over much of the Continental United States thus violating a veritable library of military instructions and SOPs when dealing with live Nuclear Warshots.



What do you think? Has the Air Force lost it? ... has all of the upheaval caused by Homeland Security and the total involvement with the Iraqi War completely derailed the normal security procedures that govern all aspects of the storage/transportation/usage of Nuclear First Strike Warshots?

There is absolutely NO WAY you can mistake a Nuclear Warshot for a practice BDU/Dummy Round IF you even use the slightest bit of common sense examination of the weapons as they are being unpacked from their packing cases and loaded onto a B-52 (or) any other plane capable of carrying them in a bomb bay or on a wing pylon.

I speak from experience and training ... someone really screwed the pooch on this one.
__________________
Fair winds and following seas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < and long may your big jib draw.
-W.R.B. (Chief Bones) FCC(SW) USN(RET)-

Last edited by Chief Bones; September 6th, 2007 at 01:06. Reason: Edited title line
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 2
Fox
Can you hear me now?
 
 
Gear

I've heard about it. Not good. Very inexuseable for the crews and pilots. We all makes mistake. But this one, that's FUBAR, yeah.
__________________
Why should I have to "Press 1 for English?"
--Every American

 
September 6th, 2007   Post 3
the_13th_redneck
Fridgeraider (Instructor)
 
 
Gear

Something's real fishy about this one.
__________________
Sergeant 13th Redneck (RET)
Republic of Korea Marine Corps
TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED

Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 4
tomtom22
Chief Engineer
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by the_13th_redneck
Something's real fishy about this one.

Yeah, it stinks to high heaven!

Somebody screwed up bigtime! Heads should roll!
__________________
"It doesn't take a hero to order men into battle. It takes a hero to be one of those men who goes into battle." - Norman Schwarskopf, Commander of Desert Storm Operations
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 5
therise21
Centurion
 
Gear

Senior Chief, I think the title of the thread is misleading. The article you linked to doesnt say ARMED nukes, it says nuclear armed cruise missiles.
__________________
your flaws are your perfection.
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 6
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear


They were obsolete nuclear bombs....
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 7
tomtom22
Chief Engineer
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
They were obsolete nuclear bombs....

Obsolete bombs can still go BANG!!


The munitions squadron commander was canned over this.
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 8
phoenix80
Banned
 
 
Gear



Quote:
Originally Posted by tomtom22
Obsolete bombs can still go BANG!!


The munitions squadron commander was canned over this.
I heard they weren't posing any danger to public though
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 9
Infern0
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix80
I heard they weren't posing any danger to public though

unless they fell off, or the plane crashed


which has happened in the past....they have these rules for a reason P80
 
September 6th, 2007   Post 10
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


There seems to be a lot of misinformation on this one. The Cold War had hundreds of near misses like this one. Now I have to ask, are B-52s not allowed to carry Nukes or is it that they may have been ARMED. If they were not ARMED I don't understand the furor and various sources are saying they were and others don't mention it and I suspect most of the hoopleheads writing the stories don't know the difference.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 



Similar Threads
Air Force In No Rush On Joint Bases
Air Force Chief Frustrated Over Helicopter Wrangling
US Air Force Loses Out In Iraq War
What should fly in the Iraqi Air Force?
Chinese military aircraft present situation