TEHRAN, Mar. 11 (ISNA)-Iran's government spokesman gave news that if the UN Security Council was to hold a session on Iran's nuclear program, President Ahmadinejad would personally attend and defend Iran's inalienable right.


"President Ahmadinejad has decided to personally attend the probable UN Security Council session which is to be held on Iran's nuclear program issue," stated Gholam Hussein Elham.


Currently the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany are debating over the draft of a sanction resolution against Iran.

This official announced that President Ahmadinejad through this presence intended to defend Iran's national and international right.

http://isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-891616&Lang=E

Why don't we just detain him once he touches down at JFK airport. Arrest that SOB and ship him to gitmo

Okay, we know where he will be. Now we need to lock the doors and burn the building down. The UN is a wonderful trap for all of the world's scum. Tell them it's a meeting and than lock the doors, pump in the gas, and light the match.

Problem solved. World Peace is issued and the UN is gone.

Originally Posted by 5.56X45mm

Okay, we know where he will be. Now we need to lock the doors and burn the building down. The UN is a wonderful trap for all of the world's scum. Tell them it's a meeting and than lock the doors, pump in the gas, and light the match.

Problem solved. World Peace is issued and the UN is gone.

sigh!!!!!!!!!

Or, you know, we could use some of that Russian "sleeping gas."

Originally Posted by major liability

Or, you know, we could use some of that Russian "sleeping gas."

I've no problem with that.

This discussion is so far disrespectful. President Alphabet is entitled to make the case why a leader who says a nearby country to his should be nuked, should then be allowed to have nuclear facilities. Simple isn't it? If I had any milbucks I would bet the UN would even buy that argument.

This discussion is so far disrespectful. President Alphabet is entitled to make the case why a leader who says a nearby country to his should be nuked, should then be allowed to have nuclear facilities. Simple isn't it? If I had any milbucks I would bet the UN would even buy that argument

LOL

Originally Posted by Padre

This discussion is so far disrespectful. President Alphabet is entitled to make the case why a leader who says a nearby country to his should be nuked, should then be allowed to have nuclear facilities. Simple isn't it? If I had any milbucks I would bet the UN would even buy that argument.

Right so because one country used to use chlorofluorocarbons and we know them to be detrimental to the environment it should then be ok for a developing country to make the same mistakes....That goes against the scientific community principals in that it is ones duty to share the knowledge they have acquired (obviously to a certain extent).

We are not talking about restrictions on DVD players we are talking about things that could seriously alter the existence of us and this planet....So while the rest of the developed world is working on reducing it stock pile of nuclear weapons and coming up with better nuclear power plant designs (look into generation 4 and 5 reactors); we do not need a new player that has little experience getting involved...

But you can understand why they would want them, seeing how Israel, an enemy of theirs, has them.

Originally Posted by I Love Guns

But you can understand why they would want them, seeing how Israel, an enemy of theirs, has them.

Yes, we can - based on one little difference:

Iranian government refuses Israel's right to exist.
And she is not alone...