|
can i say that this is a bit hypocritical
"you can't have nukes, or chem weapons"
"but you have them"
"ummmm, but we're different"
"how"
*uncomfortable shuffling*
personally i find it hard to trust ANYONE who still has these weapons at their disposal in a post cold war era.
but know one will give them up while the "other" side still has them, so where is the insentive for others (N. Korea, india, pakistan, iran etc) to give them up?
anyone got any good ideas?
|