Topic: Wars going Nuclear

SAINT · February 3rd, 2005

Going nuclear is a tempting choice for quick victory... even against another nuclear power.

If you strike first, you'll win.

I hardly believe in the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) theory.
It's only propaganda and false assurance to the people during the Cold War to think that nuclear war will not happen because of the fear of destruction on both sides.

It's an old theory.

Those that start a war will not fear death. Sanity hardly matters in war. If Hitler had nuclear weapons, he will not hesitate to use.

Especially going nuclear is even easier to achieve by the commander in chief than to mobilise a brigade of soldiers.

February 3rd, 2005
SAINT Centurion	Going nuclear is a tempting choice for quick victory... even against another nuclear power. If you strike first, you'll win. I hardly believe in the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) theory. It's only propaganda and false assurance to the people during the Cold War to think that nuclear war will not happen because of the fear of destruction on both sides. It's an old theory. Those that start a war will not fear death. Sanity hardly matters in war. If Hitler had nuclear weapons, he will not hesitate to use. Especially going nuclear is even easier to achieve by the commander in chief than to mobilise a brigade of soldiers. __________________ WHY IN THE WORLD DO WE NEED TO FIGHT SO OFTEN? HAVE WE FORGOTTEN THE BABIES?