Originally Posted by senojekips
Your "stirring" is just that, beyond which it is totally meaningless, picking one year out of 60+ is hardly a representative cross section,... then limiting it to one type of killing to distort it even further.
These figures are only from 2000 -2012 and they make your claim look stupid. http://old.btselem.org/statistics/en...Casualties.asp
It reminds me of the glutton who bolts down a dozen Big Mac's with super sized fries, and then claims that he's really trying to diet as he only drank diet coke.
You better read his post again. It's about the civilian casualty ratio
not the total casualties. What's the civilian casualty ratio of the Palestinians? 30:1?
You better thank the IDF for their precision attacks and their restraint.