Reading post 601272 in main thread: The great hoax of WW2
May 28th, 2011  
lolwhassup
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzercracker
Why? They won battle of Kursk without the western allies and that effectively meant Germany losing the war.

Britain was not pooling their entire effort to the CCCP and what they were pooling was only a fraction of Russias actuall materiel base so Lend Lease was vital only in UK and US history books.
You do realize that without the Western Allies, Kursk may not have even happened?

And by the way you misunderstood what I wrote, I meant that if Germany had defeated Britain and controlled the British Isles, GERMANY would have pooled its entire effort at the Soviet Union. With no British Isles to act as a giant unsinkable airbase for Allied bombers or staging area for Allied invasion, Germany would not have had to worry about its flank and the 59 German divisions in France and Holland, the 26 divisions in Italy that fought Anglo-American troops, wouldn't have fought them and instead been brought to the Eastern Front.
 
 
(c)02-10 Military-Quotes.com - Post # 601272