|
I find it mildly amusing to note that this researcher's findings would have been accepted at face value and quoted as being without question when they supported the beliefs of the doom sayers, yet should he find evidence that the previous findings were flawed his credibility is suddenly bought into question.
It's highly reminiscent of views held by some about Afghan warlords. When they support out ideals they are freedom fighters, when they oppose us they are terrorists.
"I am totally responsible for what I write,... however I cannot be held responsible for your complete inability to understand"
|