Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MontyB Yeah but so do all the people who say he is wrong, qualifications are irrelevant, data is all that matters. |
Do not forget that we are relying on the scientists to INTERPRET the data for us. As I said earlier, there are quite a few "scientists" here in America that have made their reputations on the Global Warming Gloom and Doom platform. I am encouraged that other scientists are willing to read the studies and conduct their own independant evaluations.
BTW Monty. If you have ever taken statistics you would understand that there are lots of ways to interpret the same data set.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MontyB Probably not, right now I neither have the time nor interest in the subject to want to read anything (lots of other things on my plate). |
You would rather just comment?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MontyB Although I have to admit the fact that he is into Intelligent Design does make me want to read it just to figure out how he reconciles hundreds of thousands of years of climate data into the 6000 year old Earth philosophy. |
Hundreds of thousands? Where did that come from? We only have hard (empirical) climate data from the last coulple hundred years. The rest of this "data" is from "estimates" or "best guesses" and is therefore suspect. If it is included then I would seriously question any conclusions derived.