Originally Posted by Chukpike
I don't care if you agree with me or not, as it seems you are argueing with your self.
Or did I miss read your post # 12: "All I can say is that he certainly won't be doing that again." quote s
I took that to mean you agreed with the execution.
Originally Posted by senojekips
I do, but they have to get it 100% correct, something that is not possible at the moment. All of your argument still does not address the state sanctioned murder of innocent persons.
The law and "forensics" still make more than their fair share of mistakes, the biggest thing in their favour is that they have found several persons on death row to be innocent. When it involves the life of an innocent person, near enough, is not good enough.
I did say the system is not perfect. I do accept that inocent people have been executed. To me that is more acceptable to society than having murders go free to kill again.
I have answered your question. Are you going to answer mine? Did I miss read your post #12? All I can say is that he certainly won't be doing that again." quote senojekips
I took that to mean you agreed with the execution. Do you or do you not agree that John Allen Mohammad should have been executed?
As I think you agree he should have been executed. How do you know he was 100% guilty as you require? How did you justify your requirement of 100%.