I guess it's how one may look at things. Couldn't the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency demand to see what the US had, after the news hit the press? It goes both ways he was no rush to deal with a messes situation either. I like his big words "he still expected "absolute transparency" from Syria and the IAEA would insist on access to other sites which might be linked to the alleged reactor." what BS. He still sat on his ass from April and done nothing and its already June so I guess wasting another almost two months seem like a good thing. I assume it was intelligence reason for not showing what was found or how it was found, or maybe knowing nothing would be done in the first place if it was shown. Again it's how you look at it.
MontyB you did make me think a little the other way on this I'll give you that.
