Ah we are already at attempted insult stage I see well sorry but you are not going to drag me into another of your thread killing cyclic arguments, I am always amused by how the very same people that deride the media for its bias and inaccuracies jump to its defense when it suits their argument.
For the record I am saying I would not take to much notice of an editorial (his
opinion) written by a man that is clearly not unbiased.
So I will leave you to it and wait to see what others have to say on the matter.
PS. It can hardly be character assassination if I am right and you post says I am:
- He was responsible for a 1995 story suggesting Michael Foot, the former leader of the Labour party, had been an agent for the KGB.
This later proved to be incorrect and the paper apologised.
- He is the author of books on the bombing of
Pan Am Flight 103, the
Waco siege, and
Special Branch, the British counter-terrorism and national-security police.
So get your last word in on the matter so that others can become involved without the tit for tat nonsense that these things deteriorate into.