Quote:
|
Originally Posted by senojekips If it were deliberate vandalism, I'm sure the perpetrator would have used something a little more damaging than "a clear oily liquid". Paint, marker pen, acid, blood, you name it, why run the risk of being caught defacing a National monument with something as innocuous as a clear oil.
Obviously someone somewhere realised that there is no political mileage in the original finding.
Y'know the old ploy, maintain the peoples rage. This is absolutely consistent with current NeoCon policies. |
i gotta say, knowing a view activist types for various causes, if you're going to make a statement, you make it big. animal blood or paint would be at the top of the list....that fact that it's a barely noticeable oil (or polish???) still gives me doubt about whether it's vandalism or not