Read main thread: Bush's new war strategy
January 30th, 2007  
MontyB
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Missileer
We (the civilized people of the World) can end the Middle East problem and stop a Global war in the making. War in the Middle East was inevitable and no one Country or leader thereof can be blamed for the nihilistic nature of radical Islam. Appeasement or isolationism won't work and never has, without a high cost. Unfortunately, some societies don't want a democracy and there is nothing any ambassador, politician, or armed force, can do to change that. When millions of people refuse to change or moderate a belief that total destruction of most of the World's population is a covenant with their god(s) and the only means of salvation is to obey their prophets, then war is inevitable forever.

A lot of people ask, who is right and who is wrong in such a war? Isn't this just a difference in civilizations? The answer is a resounding yes. There are natural taboos that have evolved as human beings came to recognize unacceptable and destructive practices. I don't mean cannibalism, headhunting, Human sacrifices, and many others that come to mind. I'm speaking of genocide, enslavement, mass murder, and denial of all freedoms except breathing.

Modern people never want to return to the fifth century and destroy everything that has been accomplished for the benefit of mankind. Men don't die at a ripe old age of 26 and girls 12 years old and younger are not forced to bear children for a tribal leader. I would rather fly in an airliner than ride a donkey. Difference in civilizations? Yep! And the operative word here is civilization.

I really thought we had moved on from the 18th century colonial thinking but it would appear not, I do not believe you can impose one civilisation on another unless they want it and are prepared to fight for it themselves.

However this really isn't a battle of civilisations it is a battle of religions as it has always been, lets face it we don't care about people riding donkeys or living in shacks as long as they leave us alone we are simply trying to make people who have been force fed Islam for 1500 years suck on Christian values.

The fact is that for 1000 years the Christian world has done all it could to impose itself on the middle east and there have been times when the Islamic world has been strong enough and tried to impose itself on Europe they have failed dismally because the people there obviously don't want it.

So after all this I believe the answer is to take the fanatics out of the equation on both sides preferably with lead poisoning, reduce the religious influence's that keep this thing fueled and it will settle down but if you try and impose your views when they clearly do not want it you will lose.

Just for shits and giggles take a look at nations where religion (doesn't matter which one) plays a major role in the day to day running of a country especially when you have more than one type and I suspect you will find the countries with the highest rates of poverty, backwardness, corruption and where you have more than one sect civil war. The strength of the west is that it has reduced religion to a personal thing and because of that we have flourished.
__________________
We are more often treacherous through weakness than through calculation. ~Francois De La Rochefoucauld

Last edited by MontyB; January 30th, 2007 at 20:06.
 
 
(c)02-08 Military-Quotes.com