Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MontyB So tell me are there any limits to the "2nd amendment?
What stops you owning a Bradley for "self defense" or maybe a small tactical nuke to ensure your safety when walking the streets, hell MAD worked during the cold war why not extend it to civilians "One funny look from a thug and boom 6 city blocks leveled bet he wont do that again."
Where does "want to have" make way for "too dangerous to own"? |
Nuclear weapons are of an indescriminant mass destruction nature.
And whats wrong with someone owning a Bradley IFV or a tank? There are lots of people in the US who collect working tanks with working guns with proper BATF paperwork.
Can you find me an instance where a legal privately owned machinegun, grenade launcher, .50 caliber rifle, tank, IFV, fighter jet, was used to kill someone in the US?