LeEnfield
Quote:
|
France did not have much of a modern Air Force and their tanks like the British ones were under gunned even if they were well armoured.Okay the French did have one tank with a large gun but it was built into the front of the tank and could not be moved quickly or trained on target with any great ease.
|
You must be referring to the Char B1, true this was a bit of a dinosaur. However, I thought the accepted view was that it was the way the tanks were used tactically, the amount of support available to repair them, their reliability, and the way they were fuelled are the main differences between the respective armoured forces at this time.
The initial engagements East of the Meuse did not go well for the Germans, but the French still retreated behind the river seeing this as a permanent defence line, thereby losing tanks which were only slightly damaged, whereas the Germans repaired theirs.
The French Somua S35 was regarded by Len Deighton in 'Blitzkrieg' as the best tank in Europe at that time. This tank had a larger caliber than all of the German tanks but the Pz Kw IV which had a much lower muzzle velocity. About half of the German tanks were Pz Kw ll s with a 2cm barrel with the minimum allied calibres being almost twice that.
Looking at the other specifications of the Allied and German tanks, it is far from clear that the Germans had any significant technical advantage in number or quality of tanks at that time.