Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chief Bones Posted by a member of a local forum:
I realise that he does a lot of Bush bashing in this post ... but ... his reasoning and his rationale coincides with the findings of many investigations and historical observations of the last 4 1/2 years.
I believe that my opinion of King George is well known on this forum ... I have made no 'BONES" about how I feel (excuse the pun).
LEAVE THE REALISATION THAT WE WOULD HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH IRAQ SOONER OR LATER OUT OF YOUR DISCUSSIONS ... IT HAS NO BEARING ON THIS POST.
WAS THIS GENTLEMAN VERY FAR OFF THE MARK? |
Well I think if all you are looking for are negatives then he is probably spot on, the problem is that in only looking for negatives you only get about half the story.
My personal belief is that while I am not GWB fan and infact would rate him as one of the worst US presidents in US history not everything he has done was wrong he has without a doubt destroyed US international relations for centuries to come and to a large degree made the world a far less secure place but he has also been forced to fight a war that cant be won, replaced a severly retarded bunch of religious freaks in Afghanistan and got rid of a thug in Iraq (While I dont support the Iraq invasion I dont think anyone can be sorry to see the end of Hussein).